The path to room-temperature superconductivity: A programmatic approach

R Rohit P. Prasankumar M Matthew Julian M Michael Hutcheon (Enterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures) C Christoph Heil (Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics, Graz University of Technology) L Liangzi Deng (Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston) D Dmitri Basov C Ching-Wu Chu (Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston) R Riccardo Comin P Philip Kim B Bryce Meredig (Travertine Labs) C Chris Pickard (Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge) W Warren E. Pickett (Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Davis) T Timothy Strobel (Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science) S Stuart Wolf E Eva Zurek (Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, 777 Natural Science Complex, Buffalo, New York 14260-3000, United States) N Nathan Myhrvold (Enterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures)

Abstract

Room-temperature superconductivity is arguably the greatest challenge in condensed matter physics, with significant practical and commercial implications if it can be solved. There are no physical laws preventing this from occurring; indeed, superconductivity has been observed in so many different materials under so many different conditions that it is almost a “generic” property of nonmagnetic metals. This guides our viewpoint that high-temperature superconductivity is possible, if difficult to realize. Here, we lay out two grand challenges facing the field, titled the Prediction Challenge and the Engineering Challenge, and put forward a programmatic approach for overcoming them. The Prediction Challenge addresses the fact that our ability to predict new conventional superconductors has dramatically advanced in recent years, but most predicted materials are not experimentally synthesizable. To address this challenge, we propose a shift from modeling the superconducting critical temperature and dynamic stability toward high-throughput ab initio and predictive thermodynamics/synthesis modeling. The Engineering Challenge describes how we can control superconductivity with various “knobs,” including pressure, nanostructuring, and light. However, our ability to predict how a specific knob will modify a given superconductor is limited, making it difficult to fully exploit them. We describe the current status and identify areas where additional work is needed to fully exploit six of the most common knobs. Progress in both of these grand challenges, while closely integrating theory and experiment into a continuous feedback loop and incorporating insights from fields beyond physics and materials science, could unlock the underlying keys to room-temperature superconductivity.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 11
Published March 17, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (16)

R

Rohit P. Prasankumar

M

Matthew Julian

M

Michael Hutcheon

Enterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures

C

Christoph Heil

Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics, Graz University of Technology

L

Liangzi Deng

Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston

D

Dmitri Basov

C

Ching-Wu Chu

Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston

R

Riccardo Comin

P

Philip Kim

B

Bryce Meredig

Travertine Labs

C

Chris Pickard

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge

W

Warren E. Pickett

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Davis

T

Timothy Strobel

Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science

S

Stuart Wolf

E

Eva Zurek

Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, 777 Natural Science Complex, Buffalo, New York 14260-3000, United States

N

Nathan Myhrvold

Enterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures