The landscape of MET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer in Southeast China: A real-world study.
Abstract
e20686 Background: MET alterations are critical oncogenic drivers in NSCLC. However, real-world data regarding the distribution, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 574 MET-altered NSCLC patients treated at a comprehensive hospital in southeastern China(July 2021-December 2023). MET alterations were categorized into MET Overexpression, MET Amplification, MET Exon14 Skipping, and MET Other Mutation, identified via PCR, IHC, NGS or FISH. MET-OE-high was defined as IHC 2+/3+. Baseline, pathological, co-mutation, treatment, and survival data were collected. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, we analyzed 24-month survival and evaluated the prognostic impact of MET-TKIs. Results: Of 574 patients: MET-OE(81.4%), MET-amp(11.0%), MET-ex14(4.70%), and Others(2.96%). Subgroups were predominantly middle-aged/elderly males, > 40% had smoking history and > 35% hypertension. Specimens were mainly from bronchoscopic or percutaneous biopsies. Pathologically, adenocarcinoma predominated across subtypes; in MET-OE, its prevalence increased with IHC intensity (p < 0.05). MET-amp exhibited the highest rates of advanced stage (87.3%), bone metastases (36.5%), and brain metastases (17.5%). TP53 was the top co-mutation(20.7%–25.0%). Targeted therapy predominated (First-line 54.6%, Second-line 38.9%), followed by chemo-immunotherapy, whereas specific MET-TKI utilization was only 10.5%. 24-month overall survival was lower in MET-amp (44.4%) and MET-ex14(48.1%) compared to MET-OE(57.2%) and Others(58.8%). MET-TKIs showed survival benefit trends in MET-OE-high, MET-ex14 and MET-amp. Post-PSM 24-month OS (treated vs untreated): 69.2% vs. 38.5% (MET-OE-high), 71.4% vs. 25.0% (MET-ex14) and 47.4% vs. 42.9% (MET-amp). Conclusions: Despite demographic similarities, MET subtypes exhibit significant pathological, co-mutational, therapeutic and prognostic heterogeneity. MET-TKIs show potential benefits for MET-OE and MET-ex14, warranting large-scale validation.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Sisi Zheng
1Yale University, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, New Haven, United States
Rixu Lin
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Xiaoxiao Zhang
iHuman Institute ShanghaiTech University
Ziyi Zuo
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Interdiscipline and Translational Medicine, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Heart and Lung, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Dan Yao
Xiaoying Huang