The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens

E Eric Lyimo (National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre) G Geofrey Makenga L Louise Turner (Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen) T Thomas Lavstsen (Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen) J John P. A. Lusingu (National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre) J Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden D Daniel T. R. Minja (National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre) C Christian W. Wang (Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen) V Vito Baraka

Abstract

Several interventional strategies have been implemented in malaria endemic areas where the burden is high, that include among others, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), a tactic that blocks transmission and can reduce disease morbidity. However, the implementation IPT strategies raises a genuine concern, intervening the development of naturally acquired immunity to malaria which requires continuous contact with parasite antigens. This study investigated whether dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc) impairs IgG reactivity to six malaria antigens. An IPTsc trial in north-eastern Tanzania administered three doses of DP or ASAQ at four-monthly intervals and the schoolchildren were followed up. This study compared IgG reactivity against GLURP-R2, MSP1, MSP3, and CIDR domains (CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4, and CIDRa1.5) of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP-1) in intervention and control groups using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. During the study, 369 schoolchildren were available for analysis, 119, 134 and 116 participants in the control, DP and ASAQ groups, respectively. Breadth of malaria antigen recognition increased significantly during and after the intervention phases and did not differ between the study groups (Trend test: DP, z-score = 5.92, p < 0.001, ASAQ, z-score = 6.64, p < 0.001 and control, z-score = 5.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the control and ASAQ group in the recognition of any of the tested antigens at all visits. In the DP group, however, during the intervention period IPTsc did not impair antibody against MSP1, MSP3, CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4 and CIDRa1.5, but it did impair against GLURP-R2. The current study has shown that effective IPTsc with DP or ASAQ does not interfere with the development of antibodies against malaria antigens of the blood stages, suggesting that the advancement of naturally acquired immunity to malaria is not impeded by IPTsc interventions.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 1
Published January 30, 2025
Pages e0316482
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (9)

E

Eric Lyimo

National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre

G

Geofrey Makenga

L

Louise Turner

Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen

T

Thomas Lavstsen

Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen

J

John P. A. Lusingu

National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre

J

Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden

D

Daniel T. R. Minja

National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre

C

Christian W. Wang

Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen

V

Vito Baraka