The efficacy of watch and wait strategy or surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer with dMMR/MSI-H guided by ctDNA dynamic monitoring (WINDOW): A single-center, open-label, prospective, phase II study.
Abstract
3559 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown potential in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evidence is limited for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) / microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRC, who respond well to immunotherapy. This study explores an optimal ctDNA-guided neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) strategy in locally advanced CRC (LACRC) patients with dMMR/MSI-H. Methods: We conducted a single-center, open-label, phase 2 trial named WINDOW involving dMMR/MSI-H LACRC patients. Patients received the anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab every three weeks. ctDNA was monitored at baseline, after 2, 4, 5, or even 6 to 8 cycles, and during post-watch-and-wait (W&W) or post-surgery periods using the Signatera platform. Starting from the 4th cycle, patients with two consecutive ctDNA-negative results were eligible for the W&W approach. Those who did not achieve ctDNA-negative or turned positive during follow-up continued immunotherapy. Surgery was performed for patients not meeting W&W criteria by the 8th cycle. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, including ctDNA-negative clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06477991). Results: From January 2023 to May 2024, 24 patients with stage II-III dMMR/MSI-H CRC were enrolled, including 18 with colon cancer and 6 with rectal cancer. At baseline, all patients had detectable ctDNA. After nIT, 87.5% (21/24) achieved two consecutive ctDNA-negative results. Among the remaining three, two underwent surgery due to sustained ctDNA-positivity (both TRG3), while one showed continuous ctDNA decrease despite obstruction and achieved pCR. One patient required emergency surgery for perforation (confirmed as pCR), while 20 were managed with the W&W strategy. Of these, 90% (18/20) achieved ctDNA negativity after two cycles, and 95% (19/20) after five cycles of nIT. With a median follow-up of 20.3 months (range: 8.7–25.0 months), none experienced recurrence, resulting in an overall CR rate of 91.7% (22/24). Notably, if ctDNA remained positive after the 5th cycle, the CR rate was only 25% (1/4), while it reached 100% (20/20) if ctDNA became negative. From the perspective of organ preservation, only 45.5% (10/22) of patients avoided surgery based on imaging alone; however, with ctDNA-guided management, 83.3% (20/24) avoided surgery. Conclusions: NIT demonstrates high efficacy in dMMR/MSI-H LACRC. The ctDNA-guided W&W strategy significantly improves organ preservation rates. Monitoring ctDNA negativity after the 5th cycle of nIT is a crucial marker of high CR rates, suggesting this cycle may represent the optimal monitoring window during nIT. Clinical trial information: NCT06477991 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Xuan Zhang
Di Cao
Jie Du
Ruixi Hu
Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Xinyi Cai
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering
Tao Wu
Kun Yu
Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, BPR 1096, Mattenstrasse 24a, Basel 4058, Switzerland
Ya Zhang
Cuifeng Xia
Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Yuqin Wang
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden
Quan Yang
Yun-Feng Li
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, PR China