The ConPET Mechanism Remains Veiled: Reply to “Unlocking the ConPeT Mechanism”

Y Yan Zhang Z Zhenbo Guo R Ronghui Qiu (Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, State Key Laboratory of Elemento‐organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry Nankai University Weijin Road No. 94 Tianjin 300071 P.R. China) Z Zhenxian Ren (Henan Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine Innovation and Transformation Henan University Kaifeng Henan 475004 P.R. China) J Jingjing Huo Y Yin Yang (State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry) B Baokun Qiao Z Zhiyong Jiang (Pingyuan Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) T Tianfei Liu (Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Elemonto-organic Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Academy of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, College of Chemistry)

Abstract

Abstract In this journal, a Correspondence by Ventura, Cozzi, and Ceroni reported time‐resolved absorption spectroscopy studies in the electron transfer process from cyanoarene photocatalyst 3,4,5,6‐tetrakis(diphenyl amino)phthalonitrile (4DPAPN) in the presence of tetrabutylammonium oxalate (TBAOx). This was used as a model reaction to investigate the mechanism of consecutive photoinduced electron transfer (ConPET) in our previously reported asymmetric [3+2] photocycloaddition. They proposed a new electron transfer pathway in which the electron from the excited state of the radical anion 4DPAPN* •− solvated in acetonitrile. This article replies to their Correspondence, including: the experimental and theoretical analysis on the driving force of electron transfer and a series of new experiments conducted with purer reagents under more stringent conditions, which suggest that the process of proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET) followed by ConPET cannot be excluded, as proposed in our previous publication. Yet, Ceroni et al.’s efforts to study organic photochemical reactions using time‐resolved spectroscopy remain worthwhile, and their proposed mechanism also led us to consider other possible pathways for the reaction. This article concludes with a series of constructive suggestions for further studying the ConPET mechanism using time‐resolved absorption spectroscopy and other techniques.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 36
Published September 01, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (9)

Y

Yan Zhang

Z

Zhenbo Guo

R

Ronghui Qiu

Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, State Key Laboratory of Elemento‐organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry Nankai University Weijin Road No. 94 Tianjin 300071 P.R. China

Z

Zhenxian Ren

Henan Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine Innovation and Transformation Henan University Kaifeng Henan 475004 P.R. China

J

Jingjing Huo

Y

Yin Yang

State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry

B

Baokun Qiao

Z

Zhiyong Jiang

Pingyuan Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

T

Tianfei Liu

Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Elemonto-organic Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Academy of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, College of Chemistry