The addition of inotuzumab ozogamicin to frontline hyper-CVAD and sequential blinatumomab leads to durable survival outcomes in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Four-year follow-up of a phase 2 study
Abstract
Abstract Background The combination of chemotherapy and blinatumomab (blina) in the frontline setting for Philadelphia-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-negative B-ALL) leads to improved outcomes. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22 antibody drug conjugate that demonstrates efficacy in the relapsed setting and may further improve outcomes in the frontline. We present the updated results with a median follow-up of 48 months from the phase II study of Hyper-CVAD plus blina +/- InO for adults with newly diagnosed (ND) Ph-negative B-ALL. Methods This phase II study included patients (pts) between 14-59 years (yrs) with ND Ph-negative B-ALL. Pts may have received 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy. Pts received Hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine (Ara-C) for up to 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of blina. Blina was initiated after 2 cycles of Hyper-CVAD for pts with high-risk features or persistent measurable residual disease (MRD)-positivity by flow cytometry (MFC). Ofatumumab 2000 mg or rituximab 375 mg/m2 was administered in pts with CD20>1%. Starting with pt #39, InO 0.3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 was administered during the 2 MTX/Ara-C cycles and 2 blina cycles. Pts received 15 maintenance cycles with POMP and blina administered after every fourth cycle for a total of 7 cycles of blina. Pts received 12 IT chemotherapies and ursodiol. Results As of July 2025, 75 pts were treated (38 without InO [cohort 1] and 37 with InO [cohort 2]). The median age was 33 yrs (range, 18–59); 45% had high-risk cytomolecular features (KMT2Ar, CRLF2 overexpression, TP53mut, complex cytogenetics, low hypodiploidy/near triploidy); 55% in cohort 1 and 35% in cohort 2 (p=0.08). All other characteristics were similar. All patients (100%) achieved a complete remission (CR); 84% after induction (81% in cohort 1 and 89% in cohort 2). Ninety-five percent of pts achieved MRD-negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) at any time (66% at CR): 97% (76%) in cohort 1 and 94% (56%) in cohort 2. Seventy-six percent of pts achieved MRD-negativity by next generation sequencing (NGS) at any time (26% at CR): 50% in cohort 1 and 79% in cohort 2. There were no early deaths. The median follow-up for cohort 1 and 2 was 73 months (28-104) and 40 months (24-53), respectively. Of the 38 pts in cohort 1, 14 pts (37%) proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT); of these, 11 (79%) remain alive in remission, 1 (7%) died in CR and 2 relapsed (2/2 with high-risk cytomolecular features, 1/2 bone marrow relapse, 1/2 bone marrow/CNS relapse). Of these 2 relapsed pts, 1 died. Twenty-four pts (63%) did not proceed to ASCT; of these, 16 (67%) remain alive in CR, 3 (13%) died in CR, and 5 (20%) relapsed (4/5 had high-risk cytomolecular features, 3/5 with bone marrow only relapse, 1/5 with bone marrow/extramedullary relapse, 1/5 with extramedullary relapse only). Of these 5 relapsed pts, 4 died. Of the 37 pts in cohort 2, 10 (37%) proceed to ASCT; all remain alive in CR. Twenty-seven pts (65%) did not proceed to ASCT, of these, 24 (89%) remain alive in CR (with 1 receiving CAR T-cell therapy) and 3 (11%) relapsed (1/3 had high-risk cytomolecular features, 2/3 with extramedullary relapse, 1/3 with bone marrow relapse). The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for the entire cohort have not been reached. The 4-year OS rates for the entire cohort, cohort 1 and cohort 2 are 91%, 82% and 100% (p=0.007), respectively, with 4-year EFS rates of 83%, 74%, and 91% (p=0.034), respectively. After a 6-month landmark, 4-year OS rates were as follows: high risk/no ASCT 79%, high risk/ASCT 90%, low risk/no ASCT 97%, low risk/ASCT 100% (p=0.15). With death as a competing risk, the 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate was 18% for cohort 1 and 8% for cohort 2 (p = 0.177) and 4-year cumulative incidence of death without relapse rate was 2% and 0% (p = 0.083), respectively. MVA for OS and EFS demonstrates that the administration of InO was the only favorable predictive factor for OS (no InO HR 12.5; p=0.02) and borderline for EFS (no InO HR 3.15; p=0.06). There were no episodes of veno-occlusive disease. Conclusion For pts with ND Ph-negative B-ALL, the addition of InO to Hyper-CVAD plus blina leads to promising survival outcomes with the majority of pts remaining in long-term remission without ASCT. Pts are currently being randomized to Hyper-CVAD plus blina +/- InO.
Article Details
Authors (17)
Hannah Goulart
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Hagop Kantarjian
2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Nitin Jain
Rita Khouri
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Tapan Kadia
2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Courtney DiNardo
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Naval Daver
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Naveen Pemmaraju
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
Alessandra Ferrajoli
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States
Alex Bataller
2Division of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Fadi Haddad
Jayastu Senapati
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Rebecca Garris
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Farhad Ravandi
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Nicholas Short
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Elias Jabbour
Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA