Terrestrial ecosystem nitrogen cycling in response to field warming: Global patterns and future trends
Abstract
Nitrogen cycling regulates terrestrial ecosystem productivity and carbon sequestration, yet its response to climate warming remains uncertain. Here, we compiled the most comprehensive dataset to date, integrating 7,941 observations from 413 field warming experiments worldwide with random forest regression and Community Land Model (CLM) simulations. Field warming significantly accelerated nitrogen cycling, increasing N 2 O emissions (+24.7%), mineralization (+25.8%), nitrification (+51.7%), and denitrification (+41.1%). Soil inorganic nitrogen also increased, while plant nitrogen remained largely unchanged. Elevated natural abundance of 15 N indicated that warming alleviates nitrogen limitation and promotes more open nitrogen cycles. Soil moisture, ecosystem type, and warming magnitude were key drivers. N 2 O emission and nitrification further intensified with increased warming magnitude in random forest analyses. In contrast, CLM5-BGC simulated weak responses in N 2 O emissions and nitrification and negative changes in nitrogen mineralization, substantially diverging from field observations. These discrepancies highlight the omission of microbial processes and the oversimplification of large-scale ecosystem feedbacks, respectively. Uniquely, this study provides a direct comparison among empirical data, random forest regression, and CLM simulations, revealing discrepancies and their potential causes. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that terrestrial nitrogen cycling is more responsive to climate warming than previously recognized and underscore the importance of integrating multiple analytical approaches to synthesize cross-scale ecological data.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (10)
Xudong Wang
Chenrui Ni
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, and College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University
Ziyi Fan
Wenao Wu
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, and College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University
Changlin Xu
State Key Laboratory of Vegetation Structure, Function and Construction (VegLab), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes, and College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University
Jiguang Feng
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, and School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University
Rui Yin
Joshua P. Schimel
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California
Margaret S. Torn
Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Biao Zhu
Institute of Ecology and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University