Temporal trends in adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy across age groups in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.

M Michael M. Caplan (Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY) D David DeStephano (2Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States) C Claire M. Sathe (Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY) M Melissa Kate Accordino (Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY) J Jason Dennis Wright (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA) D Dawn L. Hershman (Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA)

Abstract

634 Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) reduces recurrence and mortality in hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, yet adherence remains suboptimal. Adherence varies by age, with younger patients at higher risk for non-adherence. Whether increased awareness has improved adherence over time is unclear. We evaluated temporal trends in ET adherence. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan claims database. Eligible patients were 18–100 years old with non-metastatic breast cancer (2009–2022), treated with surgery within 6 months of diagnosis, and began adjuvant ET (aromatase inhibitor [AI] or tamoxifen) within 1 year of diagnosis. The analysis included patients insured 1 year prior to and 1 year following ET initiation. ET was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as adherent (PDC ≥0.80) vs non-adherent for the year after ET initiation. Trends in adherence were evaluated using the Cochran–Armitage trend test and logistic regression with an age–calendar year interaction. Age was categorized as <50 vs ≥50 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ET adherence, reported as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Results: Among 88,994 patients receiving ET (57,002 AI, 31,992 tamoxifen) from 2010–2022, the average adherence rate was 77.7% (79.3% AI, 74.9% tamoxifen). Adherence was lower in patients <50 vs ≥50 years (74.1% vs 78.8%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81–0.89). In patients <50 on an AI, adherence increased over time from 66.6% in 2010 to 76.8% in 2022 (OR per year 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.09, p < 0.001), whereas no increase in adherence over time was seen in young patients on tamoxifen or in any patients aged ≥50 years. In a multivariable analysis of the entire cohort (Table), younger age and polypharmacy (>10 concurrent medications) were associated with lower odds of adherence, while receipt of 90-day prescription supplies, chemotherapy (neoadjuvant/adjuvant), and CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with higher odds of adherence. Conclusions: Young women remain at high risk for ET non-adherence. While tamoxifen adherence did not improve over time, AI adherence increased over time in younger patients. This likely reflects heightened awareness, better supportive care, and clinician–patient discussions emphasizing AI adherence in young, high-risk populations. In contrast, despite similar increases in awareness, AI adherence has not improved in postmenopausal patients. These results highlight a persistent gap in ET adherence and the need for targeted interventions across age groups. Factors associated with adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Covariate Adjusted OR 95% CI Age <50 vs ≥50 years 0.85 0.81–0.89 Polypharmacy 0.80 0.78–0.84 90-day prescription supply 2.80 2.71–2.89 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 1.30 1.19–1.43 Adjuvant chemotherapy 1.29 1.23–1.34 CDK4/6 inhibitor use 1.55 1.15–2.08

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 634-634
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (6)

M

Michael M. Caplan

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

D

David DeStephano

2Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States

C

Claire M. Sathe

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

M

Melissa Kate Accordino

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

J

Jason Dennis Wright

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA

D

Dawn L. Hershman

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center New York New York USA