TeliMET NSCLC-04: A phase 2, open-label, randomized, global study of 2 telisotuzumab vedotin regimens in patients with previously treated c-Met protein–overexpressing, locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous <i>EGFR</i> wildtype non-small cell lung cancer.
Abstract
TPS8658 Background: c-Met protein (also known as MET protein) overexpression is observed in ∼25% of patients with non-squamous EGFR wildtype (WT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is a c-Met–directed antibody-drug conjugate consisting of the monoclonal antibody telisotuzumab and the cytotoxic payload monomethyl auristatin E. The primary analysis of the phase 2 LUMINOSTY trial (NCT03539536) demonstrated that Teliso-V at 1.9 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) was associated with durable responses in patients with previously treated c-Met protein–overexpressing (OE) advanced/metastatic (a/m) non-squamous EGFR WT NSCLC, and adverse events (AEs) were generally manageable. The overall response rate was 28.6% among all patients with c-Met protein overexpression and 34.6% among those with c-Met high protein overexpression (Camidge et al. JCO 2024;42:3000-11). Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study (NCT06568939) evaluates the safety and efficacy of Teliso-V monotherapy at 1.6 mg/kg Q2W and 1.9 mg/kg Q2W in patients with previously treated c-Met protein OE, a/m non-squamous EGFR WT NSCLC. Eligible patients are ≥18 years old with c-Met protein OE (≥25% tumor cells at 3+ intensity by immunohistochemistry assay [investigational use only assay for MET (SP44) (Roche)]), a/m non-squamous EGFR WT NSCLC. Patients must have measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0–1, and documented disease progression on ≥1 prior lines of therapy (≤1 line of prior chemotherapy) in the a/m setting. Approximately 100 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive Teliso-V monotherapy at either 1.6 mg/kg or 1.9 mg/kg Q2W until disease progression or other protocol-specified discontinuation criteria are met. The primary safety endpoints are treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; any grade and grade ≥2), interstitial lung disease (any grade and grade ≥2), peripheral neuropathy (any grade and grade ≥2), ocular surface disorders (any grade and grade ≥2), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and grade 5 TEAEs. The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response based on RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints are pharmacokinetics, patient-reported outcomes, duration of response by BICR, progression-free survival by BICR, and overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT06568939 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Alona Zer
Rambam Health, Haifa, Israel
Christine Ratajczak
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Hephzibah Adamu
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Shilpen Patel
Zhuangzhuang Liu
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Summer Xia
AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL
Nancy Zhang