Targeting nicotinamide salvage pathway is a unique metabolic vulnerability of high-risk MDS stem cells
Abstract
Abstract Background: High-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is an incurable age-related clonal disorder of the hematopoietic stem cell (HSPC). The current standard of care for MDS patients is hypomethylating agents, like azacitidine; however, only ~30% of patients respond, usually with remission of less than two years. Thus, to improve MDS patient outcomes, an unmet clinical need, it is essential to identify better therapeutic targets by exploring vulnerabilities of MDS HSPCs, the source of the disease. To this end, we have previously shown that inhibiting protein synthesis is a vulnerability for MDS. So, we further pursued studying the unique proteome of MDS to identify targetable vulnerabilities. Methods: We used CD34+ HSPCs isolated from 12 high-risk MDS patients and 15 age-matched normal bone marrow (BM) for most of our studies. For cell-intensive experiments, we used CD34+ MDS-L cell line derived from a high-risk MDS patient. Results: To study the unique proteome of MDS compared to healthy, we performed global proteomics on MDS and normal HSPCs. Protein enrichment analysis identified a significant upregulation of metabolic proteins. Indeed, Seahorse analysis of MDS and normal HSPCs validated significantly increased maximal respiration and spare respiratory capacity in MDS compared to normal HSPCs. Most of the proteins enriched in MDS, such as G6PD, MDH1, ME2, IDH2, NADK2 and SIRT2, either maintain NAD(H) redox balance or use NAD as a cofactor for their function. To establish the role of NAD metabolism in MDS, we inhibited NAMPT, the rate-limiting enzyme in the nicotinamide salvage pathway of NAD anabolism, using small molecule inhibitors (KPT-9274 and OT82) and genetic approaches. NAMPT inhibition significantly decreased NAD levels in both normal and MDS HSPCs. Subsequently, to determine the importance of NAD in MDS, we performed global proteomic analysis on MDS-Ls post 24h of OT82 treatment. Interestingly, the most significantly downregulated proteins were related to the ribosomal machinery (RRM2), cytoplasmic and mitochondrial translation (EIF4H, MRPL15). Indeed, we found that translation, as measured by puromycin incorporation post 24h of OT82 treatment, was significantly reduced in MDS HSPCs indicating a differential reliance of MDS HSPCs on NAD for protein synthesis. Furthermore, we found that NAMPT inhibition positively enriched metabolic proteins associated with amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and the citric acid cycle. Thus, to further determine how NAMPT inhibition, and its effect on translation ultimately impact metabolism in MDS, we carried out global metabolic analysis and heavy carbon labeled glucose and glutamine tracing in MDS-Ls post 24h of OT82 treatment. We found that NAMPT inhibition, reduced overall carbon flux, suggesting metabolic dysregulation, while increasing carbon flux into the aspartate-malate shuttle and the pentose phosphate pathway, both of which maintain NAD(P)H balance independently of nicotinamide metabolism. Consistently, 24h of OT82 treatment significantly reduced maximal respiration and spare respiratory capacity in MDS HSPCs compared to normal. These data indicate that NAD anabolism via the nicotinamide salvage pathway is an essential regulator of metabolic activity, exclusive to MDS HSPCs. Finally, we addressed whether NAMPT inhibition represents a therapeutic target in MDS by performing functional assays using patient samples. NAMPT inhibition significantly impaired self-renewal and colony forming potential of MDS HSPCs compared to normal. Additionally, we observed increased cell death of MDS HSPCs compared to normal post 48h of OT82 treatment. Moreover, NAMPT-induced apoptosis in MDS was revealed to be synergistic with azacitidine, the current standard of care. Importantly, to establish pre-clinical relevance of our findings, we performed xenograft studies by transplanting MDS patient BM cells and MDS-Ls into NSG-S mice. Strikingly, after 2 weeks of OT82 treatment, we observed a significant reduction in disease burden, indicating NAMPT as a tractable target for therapeutic inhibition in high-risk MDS patients. Conclusion: Our data suggest that NAMPT is uniquely required for the function and survival of MDS HSPCs compared to normal and thus can be exploited as a promising therapeutic vulnerability. The results of this pre-clinical study provide strong support for initiating NAMPT inhibitor phase I/II clinical trials to improve outcomes for high-risk MDS patients.
Article Details
Authors (28)
Sweta Patel
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Daniel Moskop
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Steven Moreira
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Stephanie Gipson
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Colin Anderson
2University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Aurora, United States
Alexendra Crook
2University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Aurora, United States
Maxwell McCabe
2University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Aurora, United States
Daniel Stephenson
Hannah Terry
3Knox College, Galesburg, United States
Andrew Kent
4Division of Hematology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
Tracy Young
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Anna Krug
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Caitlin Price
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Monica Ransom
1University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
Regan Miller
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Ana Vujovic
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Mohd Minhajuddin
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Mark Althoff
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States
Anthony Saviola
Robert Welner
1University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
Ekaterina Andrianova
5Genome Protection, Inc, Buffalo, United States
Andrei Gudkov
10Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, United States
Angelo D'Alessandro
Brett Stevens
4Division of Hematology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
Travis Nemkov
Austin Gillen
1University of Colorado, Aurora, United States
Craig Jordan
9University of Colorado Anshutz Medical Campus, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Aurora, United States
Eric Pietras
1University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Aurora, United States