Targeting BTKi-resistant CLL using the dual irreversible/reversible 4th generation BTK inhibitor rocbrutinib

B Britten Gordon (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) L Lillian Cool (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) E Elizabeth Muhowski (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) L Lianbo Yu J Janani Ravikrishnan (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) S Samon Benrashid (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) A Andrew Mitchell A Alexander He (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) S Shrilekha Misra (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) T Tzung-Huei Lai (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) S Shanmugapriya Thangavadivel (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) A Alexander Marr (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) J Jazmin Urrutia (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) C Casey Leimbach (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) N Naina Karnati (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) S Serena Li Zhao S Sonam Sonam S Smita Kumari E Elizabeth Perry K Kerry Rogers (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) A Adam Kittai (2Mount Sinai, New York City, United States) S Seema Bhat (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) A Aseel Alsouqi (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) N Natarajan Muthusamy (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) J John Byrd (3University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States) D Deepa Sampath (4MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) R Rosa Lapalombella (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) B Blake Peterson (1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States) Y Yi Chen S Stephen Anthony (7Halia Therapeutics, Inc., Lehi, Utah, United States) Y Yu Chen J Jennifer Woyach (31The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Treatment of CLL has been transformed by targeted therapies including inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTKi). Currently, three covalent BTKi (cBTKi) are approved for CLL, but most patients eventually relapse, commonly through acquisition of the C481S BTK mutation (Woyach et al., 2014). Non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi) retain activity against C481 mutations, but are susceptible to secondary BTK mutations (T474I, L528W, M437R, and V416L), which can also confer resistance to covalent BTKi (Wang et al., 2022). Regardless of these mutations, BCR signaling remains intact, suggesting that inhibition of the BCR pathway retains its therapeutic importance. Agents capable of targeting and inhibiting both wild-type (WT) and mutant BTK (C481S, T474I, and L528W) are ideal for treating CLL to retain BTK inhibition and prevent clinical relapse through the most common resistance mechanisms. Rocbrutinib is a novel selective BTKi with an active warhead capable of binding both WT and mutant BTK. Methods: Validation of covalent binding was performed by X-Ray co-crystallography. To confirm binding of rocbrutinib to WT and mutant BTK, we performed a NanoBRET assay against WT, C481S, T474I, and L528W BTK. To further measure the binding affinity of rocbrutinib and the currently available BTKi towards full-length WT and mutant BTK in HEK293T cells, we utilized a fluorescent probe cellular binding assay (FPCBA) (Yin et al., 2024). Using genetically modified TMD8 cells that express only C481S, T474I, or L528W mutated BTK, we determined the effect of rocbrutinib on cell viability and BCR signaling. Primary CLL B-cells were isolated and treated with rocbrutinib for all experiments. BCR signaling alterations were assessed via immunoblot to observe changes in target protein phosphorylation. In vivo studies were performed using Eμ-TCL1 and Eμ-MTCP1 mouse engraftment models. Results: A crystal structure of BTK in complex with rocbrutinib showed rocbrutinib binds BTK in the ATP-binding site, forms a covalent bond to C481, and forms hydrogen bonds to M477, D539, and K430. In a NanoBRET assay, rocbrutinib demonstrated low nanomolar binding affinity towards the WT, C481S, T474I, and L528W BTK proteoforms with IC50 values of 4.7, 49.7, 13.1, and 80.4 nM, respectively. Using FPCBA, rocbrutinib was the only BTKi—among ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, nemtabrutinib, and pirtobrutinib—to retain nanomolar potency against WT BTK as well as clinically relevant resistance mutations, including C481S, V416L, M437R, and L528W. In TMD8 cells, rocbrutinib maintained nanomolar GI50 towards WT, C481S, T474I, and L528W BTK. Rocbrutinib also inhibited BCR signaling regardless of BTK mutation status demonstrated by reducing production of CCL3 (WT: 98.8%, p<0.0001; C481S: 99.1%, p<0.0001; T474I: 98.9%, p<0.0001; L528W: 99.6%, p<0.0001) and CCL4 (WT: 97.3%, p<0.0001; C481S: 96.3%, p<0.0001; T474I: 97.3%, p<0.0001; L528W: 99.3%, p<0.0001) as well as inhibiting BTK, PLCγ2, ERK, and AKT activation. After two-hours of treatment, 500 nM rocbrutinib inhibited BCR signaling in primary CLL B-cells, demonstrated by reduced phosphorylation of BTK (98.9%, p<0.0001), PLCγ2 (85.6%, p<0.0001), ERK (59.3%, p=0.0029), and AKT (68.9%, p=0.0014). Furthermore, we observed retained inhibition of BCR signaling in primary CLL B-cells harboring C481S BTK via immunoblotting and cytokine production. Finally, to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of rocbrutinib, we evaluated its therapeutic impact in both the Eµ-TCL1 and Eµ-MTCP1 mouse models. We treated mice daily via oral gavage and found that 50 mg/kg of rocbrutinib significantly improved survival in the Eµ-TCL1 model when compared to vehicle (median 51 vs 44 days; p=0.0018) or ibrutinib at the same dose (median 51 vs 45 days; p=0.0098). Similarly, in the Eµ-MTCP1 model, rocbrutinib (50 mg/kg) markedly improved survival relative to vehicle (median 122 vs 62 days; p<0.0001) or ibrutinib at the same dose (median 122 vs 96 days; p=0.0162). Conclusion: Collectively, our findings demonstrate rocbrutinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of BTK with activity even in the presence of mutations that mediate resistance to cBTKi and ncBTKi. These data support the continued investigation of rocbrutinib, which is currently being studied in the phase 1 setting of CLL and NHL (NCT04775745 and NCT04993690).

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1532-1532
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (32)

B

Britten Gordon

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

L

Lillian Cool

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

E

Elizabeth Muhowski

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

L

Lianbo Yu

J

Janani Ravikrishnan

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

S

Samon Benrashid

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

A

Andrew Mitchell

A

Alexander He

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

S

Shrilekha Misra

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

T

Tzung-Huei Lai

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

S

Shanmugapriya Thangavadivel

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

A

Alexander Marr

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

J

Jazmin Urrutia

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

C

Casey Leimbach

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

N

Naina Karnati

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

S

Serena Li Zhao

S

Sonam Sonam

S

Smita Kumari

E

Elizabeth Perry

K

Kerry Rogers

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

A

Adam Kittai

2Mount Sinai, New York City, United States

S

Seema Bhat

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

A

Aseel Alsouqi

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

N

Natarajan Muthusamy

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

J

John Byrd

3University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States

D

Deepa Sampath

4MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

R

Rosa Lapalombella

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

B

Blake Peterson

1The Ohio State University, Internal Medicine, Columbus, United States

Y

Yi Chen

S

Stephen Anthony

7Halia Therapeutics, Inc., Lehi, Utah, United States

Y

Yu Chen

J

Jennifer Woyach

31The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States