Tafasitamab-containing regimens in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A real-world retrospective case series
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Br J Haematol 2024;205(6):2163-2174). Although first-line treatment with R-CHOP achieves remission in a substantial proportion of patients, many ultimately develop relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Currently, therapeutic options for these patients remain limited, particularly for those who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation (J Clin Oncol 2014;32(10):1066-73; Blood 2022;140 Suppl:12089). Tafasitamab is a humanized, Fc-enhanced monoclonal antibody targeting CD19 (Blood 2024;143(3):258-271); it has been approved in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of adults with R/R DLBCL, representing the first second-line therapy approved for this patient population (Drugs 2020;80(16):1731-1737). However, real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of tafasitamab-containing regimens, particularly with novel combinations incorporating radiotherapy (RT) or PD-1 inhibitors, is scarce in the Chinese population. This case series characterizes the clinical outcomes of tafasitamab-containing therapies in routine clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed five consecutive R/R DLBCL patients (median age 81 years, range 50-87) with poor baseline PS (ECOG ≥2: 3/5 patients; ECOG 3: 1 patient) and high tumor burden treated between Jan 2024-Jul 2025. All were heavily pretreated (median prior lines: 4; range 2-7) and transplant-ineligible. Tafa combinations included RT (n=1) or PD-1 inhibitors (tislelizumab, n=2). Outcomes included clinical response (Lugano 2014) and safety (CTCAE v5.0). Results: Cohort Vulnerability: Patients exhibited high-risk features: advanced age (≥80 years: n=3), ECOG ≥2 (n=3), high IPI (≥3: n=2), double-expressor lymphoma (n=2), bone marrow involvement (n=2), and pre-existing infection (n=1). Five patients (P1-P5) were included, with details as follows: P1: 81-year-old female with stage IVA germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL (ECOG 2). After 4 prior therapies with partial response (PR), she achieved stable disease with tafasitamab + lenalidomide after 2 cycles, with only grade 1 leukopenia and grade 2 thrombocytopenia. P2: 87-year-old female with stage IIB non-GCB DLBCL (ECOG 2, IPI 3, MYC/BCL2 double expression). Uncontrolled after 4 prior regimens, she achieved PR with tafasitamab + lenalidomide + radiotherapy + zanubrutinib (maintained through cycle 3), but she had pre-existing pulmonary infection, recurrent infections, and grade 4 neutropenia. Subsequent treatment consisted of a regimen combining tafasitamab and adoptive NK cell-based immunotherapy, and progressed in cycle 4 after switching regimens. P3: 68-year-old male with stage IVB non-GCB DLBCL (ECOG 0, IPI 2). After partial metabolic response to first-line therapy, he achieved a complete response (CR) with tafasitamab + lenalidomide after 1 cycle, with no treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). P4: 82-year-old female with stage IVB non-GCB DLBCL (ECOG 3, IPI 5, MYC/BCL2 double expression). Previously treated with ZRD, she received tafasitamab with no TRAEs; treatment was ongoing at analysis, with response unassessed. P5: 50-year-old female with stage IVB non-GCB DLBCL (transformed from mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; ECOG 0, IPI 2). She achieved CR with tafasitamab + lenalidomide + tislelizumab after 2 cycles, maintaining remission for 6 additional cycles with no TRAEs over 8 total cycles. These patients had an advanced average age of 81 years (range: 50-87), with 80% at stage IV and generally poor baseline status. However, in real-world practice, flexible tafa-len-based combinations (including PD-1 inhibitors, radiotherapy, or BTK inhibitors) yielded favorable outcomes (best ORR: 75%, CR rate: 50%), with good overall safety. Progression-free survival was maintained in 80% (4/5) of patients during the follow-up period. Conclusion: This real-world series demonstrates that tafa-containing regimens exhibit clinically meaningful activity in extremely frail, heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL patients with poor baseline PS (ECOG ≥2 in 80%). Critically, combinations incorporating radiotherapy or PD-1 inhibition (tislelizumab) yielded significant responses. These novel combinations warrant prospective investigation in high-risk, poor-PS R/R DLBCL populations where effective, tolerable therapies are urgently needed.
Article Details
Authors (9)
Jingyi Xie
Jinshan Gu
1CLIFFORD HOSPITA, Immuno‑oncology department of the cancer center, Guangzhou, China
Rui Jia
Ge Zhang
Guoming Xie
Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medical Diagnostics, Ministry of Education, Department of Laboratory Medicine
Jianing Li
BLSA-ZJU Research Center and Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Gao Yan
3Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Huiqiang Huang
Qichun Cai
1CLIFFORD HOSPITA, Immuno‑oncology department of the cancer center, Guangzhou, China