Systematic review of 2L+ ADC strategies in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Abstract
e15009 Background: TNBC is highly aggressive with limited treatment options in the 2L+ setting, underscoring critical unmet clinical needs. Recent strategies leverage precision targeting therapies involving antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Here, we explore these strategies and their potential to redefine current treatment paradigms in TNBC. Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in LARVOL CLIN, an outcomes database with over 100K trials to identify P2/3 trials evaluating ADCs in 2L+ TNBC. Trials were assessed using digitized KM data and HRs extracted from forest plots. Results: 7 trials evaluating 2L+ ADCs in TNBC had mature data (Table 1). ASCENT, EVER-132-001, and NCT05113966 examined 3L+ sacituzumab govitecan (SG); OptiTROP-Breast01 evaluated 3L+ sacituzumab tirumotecan (ST); METRIC examined 2/3L glembatumumab vedotin (GV); EV-202 assessed 2L+ enfortumab vedotin (EV) efficacy and DESTINY-Breast04 evaluated 2L+ trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). ASCENT and OptiTROP-Breast01 met their primary endpoint with significantly improved PFS, and enhanced OS and ORR compared to standard-of-care (SoC). Their safety profiles highlight common but manageable hematologic toxicity. In contrast, METRIC failed to meet its primary endpoint with outcomes and risk/benefit comparable to SoC. EVER-132-001 has promising outcomes with SG in the Chinese population, with higher mOS, mPFS and ORR compared to ASCENT, though caution is required with cross-trial comparisons. SG after Trilaciclib (NCT05113966), in contrast to SG monotherapy, exhibited fewer adverse events (AE), especially neutropenia and diarrhea, and slightly higher preliminary mOS. In EV-202, EV showed comparable efficacy and AEs to SG. Finally, DESTINY-Breast04 showed interesting T-DXd efficacy signals. Conclusions: Emerging data from P2/3 trials highlight ADCs potential in the 2/3L setting for TNBC. SG has established its superiority over SoC, receiving FDA approval for TNBC after 2+ prior systemic therapies, ³1 for metastatic stage. Its combination with CDK/6 inhibitors should be further evaluated. Novel agents, ST, EV and T-DXd show promising results, prompting further investigation and validation of ADCs in heavily pretreated TNBC patients. Trials summary. OptiTROP-Breast01 METRIC ASCENT NCT05113966 EVER-132-001 EV-202 DESTINY-Breast04 P3, N=254 P2, N=327 P3, N=529 P2, N=30 P2, N=80 P2, N=329 P3, N=557 Target TROP2 GPNMB TROP2 TROP2 TROP2 NECTIN4 HER2 Intervention ST GV SG SG + Trilaciclib SG EV T-DXd N=130 N=218 N=267 N=30 N=80 N=42 N=40 Control SoC SoC SoC - - - SoC N=133 N=108 N=262 N=18 OS HR 0.53* 1.06 0.52* 0.58 mOS, months NR vs 9.4 8.9 vs 8.7 11.8 vs 6.9 15.9 14.7 12.9 17.1 vs 8.3 PFS HR 0.32* 0.95 0.41* 0.29* mPFS, months 6.7 vs 2.5 2.9 vs 2.8 4.8 vs 1.7 4.1 5.6 3.5 6.3 vs 2.9 ORR% 45.4 vs 12 16 vs 15 31 vs 4 25 40 19 NR CR% NR 1 vs 3 4 vs 1 0 4 NR NR PR% NR 16 vs 12 27 vs 3 25 36 NR NR AE Gr3+% 57.7 vs 56.6 71 vs 57 73 vs 65 52.9 79 28.6 NR *: statistically significant; NR: not reported.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Judith Pérez-Granado
The Larvol Group, LLC, San Francisco, CA
Kamal S. Saini
Luca Cantini
Shakti Ramkissoon
Heidi C. Ko
Laura Vidal Boixader
Fortrea Inc., Durham, NC
Isagani Chico
Fortrea Inc., Durham, NC
Bruno Larvol
The Larvol Group, LLC, San Francisco, CA
Mark Gramling
The Larvol Group, LLC, San Francisco, CA