Symptoms and life impact of polycythemia vera (PV): Results from a qualitative patient interview study.

D David Cella K Kristen M. Pettit (University of Michigan, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI) A Aniket Bankar (1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada) A Andrew Tucker Kuykendall (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) N Naveen Pemmaraju (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States) M Matthew Reaney (11IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, United States) F France Ginchereau Sowell (IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC) M Michelle Mao (IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC) A Allison Leso (IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC) A A. Peter Peter Morello (Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA) S Suneel K. Gupta (Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA) P Phil Dinh (8Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) J Jie Xiao S Sarita Khanna (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States) A Arturo Molina (9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States)

Abstract

e23259 Background: PV is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive red blood cell production. Patients with PV report a substantial symptom burden, including fatigue, pruritus, and concentration problems. To our knowledge, this is the first observational qualitative interview study focused on the PV patient experience. Our objectives were to (a) enhance a literature-informed preliminary PV conceptual disease model of signs, symptoms, and impacts on patients’ lives and (b) assess content validity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for PV, including the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form (SF)-8a and the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version 4.0. Methods: Adults (≥18 years old) in the USA with a documented PV diagnosis who required ≥3 phlebotomies/year were recruited. Patients participated in 1:1 semi-structured phone interviews (approximately 90 minutes in duration) that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative analysis software (MAXQDA). Interviews began with open-ended exploration of patients’ experience with PV symptoms/impacts (ie, “concept elicitation [CE]”). Salient concepts were defined by frequency (≥6 patients) and mean bother or impact rating (score ≥5 out of 10). Interviews thereafter assessed patients’ understanding of PRO instrument items and their relevance to PV (ie, “cognitive debriefing [CD]”). Results: Twenty patients participated (50% male; mean age, 66.1 years [range, 31-81]; mean time since diagnosis, 5.9 years [range, 1.75-13.25 years]; mean annual phlebotomy rate, 5.3 [range, 3-16]). The majority (55%) received concurrent cytoreductive therapy. CE identified 44 signs/symptoms and 33 impacts. Salient signs/symptoms (n = 15 of 44) included fatigue, itchiness, and low energy; salient impacts (n = 21 of 33) included sleep disturbances, difficulties with self-care or activities of daily living, and work limitations. Using CE data, the preliminary PV conceptual disease model was further refined to include 16 signs/symptoms and 21 impacts in the model. In CD, patients generally found the PROMIS Fatigue SF-8a to be clear, easy to understand, and relevant; this instrument also adequately captured the most salient concept (fatigue). Patients also reported that the MFSAF was generally clear, easy to understand, and largely relevant to their PV experience. Conclusions: The qualitative evidence from these combined CE/CD interviews in 20 patients has produced a more comprehensive understanding of PV, which has been represented in a conceptual model. The evidence also supports the content validity of the PROMIS Fatigue SF-8a and the MFSAF in PV. These findings informed the patient-reported endpoints in the phase 3 VERIFY study (Kuykendall AT et al. J Clin Oncol 2025;43(17_suppl):LBA3) investigating the current standard-of-care plus rusfertide or placebo for treatment of patients with PV who require frequent phlebotomy.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

D

David Cella

K

Kristen M. Pettit

University of Michigan, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI

A

Aniket Bankar

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada

A

Andrew Tucker Kuykendall

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

N

Naveen Pemmaraju

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

M

Matthew Reaney

11IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, United States

F

France Ginchereau Sowell

IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC

M

Michelle Mao

IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC

A

Allison Leso

IQVIA Holdings, Inc., Durham, NC

A

A. Peter Peter Morello

Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA

S

Suneel K. Gupta

Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA

P

Phil Dinh

8Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

J

Jie Xiao

S

Sarita Khanna

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States

A

Arturo Molina

9Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, United States