Switching N‐N Versus N‐H Couplings in Nitrate Electroreduction With CuPd Surface Atomic Motifs
Abstract
ABSTRACT Nitrate electroreduction reaction (NO 3 − RR) offers a promising solution to address excessive nitrate emissions by converting them into either environmentally benign dinitrogen or useful ammonia. Bimetallic catalysts, such as CuPd, have been recognized to be active for NO 3 − RR. However, the product discrepancies over bimetallic catalysts hinder further rational construction, largely owing to the poor understanding of how atomic‐level surface structures precisely control post‐NO reduction pathways via crucial intermediates binding. Herein, we take CuPd as model bimetallic catalysts with ordered (o‐CuPd) and phase‐segregated (p‐CuPd) architectures, featuring Cu‐Pd hetero‐motifs and Cu‐Cu/Pd‐Pd homo‐motifs on the surface, respectively, to elucidate the structure‐performance relationship. The o‐CuPd enabled selective N 2 production with a current density up to 200 mA cm −2 and Faradaic efficiency of ∼95%, whereas the p‐CuPd achieved NH 3 formation with 195 mA cm −2 and ∼84% FE. Multiple in situ studies and DFT calculations disclosed that the binding strength of *NO intermediates scales linearly with that of *N, and their adsorption strengths over Cu‐Pd and Cu‐Cu or Pd‐Pd motifs play a crucial role in determining the post‐NO reduction pathways towards either N‐N or N‐H couplings, resulting in distinct final products. This work provides new insights for the rational construction of bimetallic catalysts for denitrification and ammonia electrosynthesis.
Article Details
Authors (14)
Keying Wu
Research Center for Carbon‐Neutral Environmental & Energy Technology, Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China
Wei Wu
Siyuan Liu
Sydney Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre
Ruoqi Zhang
Department of Chemistry Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
Yu Chen
Jingwei Li
Process Research and Development
Xuan Wei
Analysis and Testing Center University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu P. R. China
Kanglei Pang
Department of Chemistry
Kaiwei Wan
Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology
Weidong Dai
Chiyao Tang
Research Center for Carbon‐Neutral Environmental & Energy Technology Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu China
Jiong Li
Chang Long
Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences
Fan Dong
Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, School of Resources and Environment