Survivorship outcomes of stage I testis cancer management.

A Adri Durant (Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN) M Mimi Nguyen (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) C Cullen Hudson (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) H Hanna Schaeffeler (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) D David A. Helfinstine (Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) H Holly K. Van Houten (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Clint Cary (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) T Timothy Masterson (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) M Mark Tyson (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ)

Abstract

605 Background: Patients with stage I testicular cancer (TCa) have excellent survival, and surveillance after orchiectomy is often preferred. Limited data exist on survivorship outcomes of surveillance versus adjuvant therapy. We compared systemic health outcomes between patients managed with surveillance and those treated with upfront therapy. Methods: Claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (2007–2022) identified stage I TCa patients managed with surveillance, chemotherapy, or radiation. Adjuvant therapy was defined as chemotherapy or radiation within 4 months of diagnosis with no further therapy. Chemotherapy codes were required within 42 days to ensure multiple cycles were not given. Propensity score–matched cohorts were created using logistic regression. A 3-year analysis evaluated new diagnoses of cardiopulmonary complications, metabolic syndrome, men’s health, psychological, and miscellaneous systemic conditions. Outcomes were stratified by treatment group. Chi-square tests and Cox regression analyses compared survivorship outcomes between adjuvant therapy and surveillance. Results: Eight-hundred forty-two patients had 3 years of coverage: 531 surveillance, 159 chemotherapy, and 152 radiation. No significant differences were found in cardiopulmonary, metabolic, psychological, or other systemic outcomes between therapy and surveillance (Table 1). Men’s health diagnoses were more frequent with chemotherapy (35.2% vs 23.9%, p=0.027) compared to surveillance. However, Cox regression showed no significant time-to-event differences on time-to-event analysis between groups. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with higher rates of men’s health complications (infertility, erectile dysfunction, hypogonadism), but over time the risk is not significantly different than surveillance. Propensity-score matched survivorship outcomes: A) surveillance vs chemotherapy; B) surveillance vs radiation. A) Surveillance (N=159) Chemotherapy (N=159) p value Cardiopulmonary Complications 0.157 Yes 14 (8.8%) 22 (13.8%) No 145 (91.2%) 137 (86.2%) Men’s Health Complications 0.027 Yes 38 (23.9%) 56 (35.2%) No 121 (76.1%) 103 (64.8%) Metabolic Syndrome Complications 0.631 Yes 53 (33.3%) 49 (30.8%) No 106 (66.7%) 110 (69.2%) Miscellaneous Systemic Disorders 0.879 Yes 25 (15.7%) 26 (16.4%) No 134 (84.3%) 133 (83.6%) Psychological Diagnoses 0.401 Yes 29 (18.2%) 35 (22.0%) No 130 (81.8%) 124 (78.0%) B) Surveillance (N=152) Radiation (N=152) p value Cardiopulmonary Complications 0.682 Yes 12 (7.9%) 14 (9.2%) No 140 (92.1%) 138 (90.8%) Men’s Health Complications 0.630 Yes 51 (33.6%) 55 (36.2%) No 101 (66.4%) 97 (63.8%) Metabolic Syndrome Complications 0.086 Yes 42 (27.6%) 56 (36.8%) No 110 (72.4%) 96 (63.2%) Miscellaneous Systemic Disorders 0.650 Yes 25 (16.4%) 28 (18.4%) No 127 (83.6%) 124 (81.6%) Psychological Diagnoses 0.650 Yes 28 (18.4%) 25 (16.4%) No 124 (81.6%) 127 (83.6%)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 605-605
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

A

Adri Durant

Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN

M

Mimi Nguyen

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

C

Cullen Hudson

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

H

Hanna Schaeffeler

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

D

David A. Helfinstine

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

H

Holly K. Van Houten

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Clint Cary

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

T

Timothy Masterson

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

M

Mark Tyson

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ