Survival outcomes of stages II-IV gastric cancer: A 13-year single center experience.

A Ahmed Nabil Mohamed Hassan (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) M Muaz Alsabbagh Alchirazi (1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States) H Hadil Zureigat (5Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States) B Bridget Adcock (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) A Aastha Dhakal (1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States) N Naveen Rehman (1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States) M Moath Albliwi (1Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States) A Ali Mushtaq M Monica Lee S Sara F Haddad (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) H Heya Batah (1Cleveland Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States) E Emily Craig Zabor (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) B Bassam N. Estfan (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) K Kanika G. Nair (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Suneel Deepak Kamath (Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH) S Smitha S. Krishnamurthi (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) W Wen Wee Ma (Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH) A Alok A. Khorana (Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH) M Michael J. McNamara (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH) M Moaath Khader Mustafa Ali (Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH)

Abstract

e16091 Background: The management of locoregional and metastatic gastric cancers (Ga-Ca) has significantly changed, particularly with the introduction of anti-HER2 drugs and immunotherapy (IT). This study aims to describe outcomes of locoregional (stages II-IVA) and metastatic (IVB) Ga-Ca. Methods: This retrospective study included adult Pts (diagnosed with stages II-IV Ga-Ca, treated at Cleveland Clinic from 1/2010 - 12/2022. We excluded Pts who had Siewert classification 1+2 and Pts who did not receive systemic therapy. Data included demographics, clinical variables (ECOG, BMI, comorbidities), tumor stage, and all treatment modalities. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from diagnosis or treatment, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (CPH) were used to adjust for covariates. Results: Key baseline variables and survival outcomes are summarized in Table 1. In the locoregional disease (n = 194), 80 (41%), 102 (53%) and 12 (6.2%) had stages II, III and IVA, respectively. 78% had gastrectomy and 51% had radiation (RT). Pts received: Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) (n = 51, 31%), preoperative CRT + gastrectomy (18, 12%), adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) + gastrectomy (45, 31%), pre/peri-operative CTX + gastrectomy (31, 21%) and other modalities. In preoperative CRT + gastrectomy, 7 Pts received carboplatin + paclitaxel (39%) and 7 received cisplatin + fluorouracil (39%). In the adjuvant group, 49% received FOLFOX. In pre/peri-operative group, 55% received FLOT. On multivariable CPH, compared to definitive CRT, pre/peri-operative CTX + gastrectomy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.52, P = 0.04) but not adjuvant + gastrectomy (HR 0.82, P = 0.4) or preoperative CRT + gastrectomy (HR 0.86, P = 0.6). Stages III & IVA had worse OS than stage II (P < 0.01). In metastatic disease (i.e., stage IVB), CTX with palliative RT was administered in 35 Pts (21%) and systemic therapy alone in 131 Pts (79%). Systemic therapy included: FOLFOX/ XELOX (n = 86, 52%), anti-HER2 therapy (8, 4.8%) and IT ± CTX (10, 6%). CTX with palliative RT was not associated with improved OS compared to systemic therapy alone (HR 1.23, 95%CI 0.83-1.83, P = 0.3). On multivariable CPH, IT ± CTX was associated with improved OS compared to FOLFOX/ XELOX (HR 0.4, 95%CI 0.18-0.9, P = 0.01). The combined benefit of modern regimens (IT ± CTX AND anti-HER2 + CTX vs . CTX) resulted in a 54% decrease in mortality (HR 0.46., 95%CI 0.24-0.9, P = 0.01). Conclusions: In this study, pre/peri-operative CTX + gastrectomy significantly improved OS in locoregional Ga-Ca. For metastatic Ga-Ca, modern systemic therapies, including IT and anti-HER2 treatments, demonstrated superior OS compared to conventional CTX regimens. Characteristic Stage II-IVAN=194 Stage IVBN=166 Median Age, yrs (IQR) 65 (57, 74) 66 (55, 74) Male 70% 68% White 75% 78% Never smoker 34% 41% Median follow-up, months 71 23 2-year OS 63% 19% Response rate 81% 54%

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

A

Ahmed Nabil Mohamed Hassan

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

M

Muaz Alsabbagh Alchirazi

1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States

H

Hadil Zureigat

5Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States

B

Bridget Adcock

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

A

Aastha Dhakal

1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States

N

Naveen Rehman

1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States

M

Moath Albliwi

1Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States

A

Ali Mushtaq

M

Monica Lee

S

Sara F Haddad

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

H

Heya Batah

1Cleveland Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States

E

Emily Craig Zabor

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

B

Bassam N. Estfan

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

K

Kanika G. Nair

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Suneel Deepak Kamath

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH

S

Smitha S. Krishnamurthi

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

W

Wen Wee Ma

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

A

Alok A. Khorana

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

M

Michael J. McNamara

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

M

Moaath Khader Mustafa Ali

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH