Survival impact of adjuvant treatment in resected stage III cutaneous melanoma patients: Results from a real-life cohort study (TAMARIS).

C Charlee Nardin (Université de Franche-Comté, Inserm 1098 RIGHT, Besançon, France) T Théo Erard (University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besancon, France) M Mona Amini Adle (Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) H Henri Montaudie (Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France) J Julie Charles M Marc Puyraveau (Centre de Méthodologie Clinique, CHU, Besançon, France) G Geraldine Jeudy (Department of Dermatology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France) P Philippe Bernard (CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France) F Florent Grange (CH de Valence, Valence, France) D Delphine Legoupil (Dermatology Department, CHRU Brest, Brest, France) O Ouidad Zehou (APHP Henri Mondor, Dermatology, Créteil, France) P Philippe Célérier (Dermatology Department, La Rochelle-Ré-Aunis Hospital Group, La Rochelle, France) C Candice Lesage (Dermatology Departement, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France) F François Aubin (Groupe Infectiologie et Infections Sexuellement Transmissibles (GrIDIST) of the French Society of Dermatology, Paris) A Amir Khammari (Oncodermatology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France) G Gaëlle Quereux (Dermatology Department, Nantes University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1413, Immunologie et Nouveaux Concepts en Immunothérapie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1302, Nantes, France)

Abstract

9576 Background: Anti-PD-1 immunotherapies and BRAF+MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) (specifically for BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma) have been shown to improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients (pts) with resected stage III metastatic melanoma in phase III trials. However, none of these studies has demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS). Notably, adjuvant BRAFi/MEKi therapy has shown better OS only in the BRAF V600E subgroup of patients. In this context, we evaluated the real-world impact of adjuvant therapies on OS. Methods: TAMARIS is a national multicenter retrospective study designed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant treatment (anti-PD-1 or BRAFi/MEKi) in pts with resected AJCC 8 th edition stage III melanoma using data from the French RIC-Mel prospective database. The primary endpoint was OS analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, comparing pts who received adjuvant treatment (adjuvant group) within 3 months of surgery to those who did not (control group). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using chi-square analyses. Secondary endpoints included OS in specific subgroups and RFS. Results: A total of 1,172 pts (median age: 65 years [IQR: 53–74]) with resected stage III melanoma were included between 2018 and 2023. Among them, 796 pts (68%) received adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 (n=676) or BRAFi/MEKi (n=120). The median treatment duration was 10.8 months (IQR: 5.6–11.9). Most pts had a history of SSM (54%) with a median Breslow thickness of 2.8 mm [range, 0-47] and stage IIIB (31%) or IIIC disease (49%). Surgical interventions for metastases prior to adjuvant treatment included lymph node dissection in 53% of cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy in 38%, and cutaneous metastasis resection in 8%. Pts in the control group were older (median age: 69.7 vs. 63.0 years, p < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 30.4 months (IQR: 16.7-43.3). OS was significantly longer in the adjuvant group compared to the control group (HR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.474-0.802; p = 0.0003), with a 2-year OS of 90% (95% CI: 88-92) in the adjuvant group versus 79% (95% CI: 74-83) in the control group. There was a trend toward better OS with BRAFi/MEKi compared to anti-PD-1 (HR: 0.569; 95% CI: 0.312-1.037; p = 0.065). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a significant positive impact of adjuvant treatment on OS across most subgroups, except for pts aged ≤75 years, those with stage IIIA disease, primary melanomas with a Breslow thickness <2.8 mm, or without ulceration. RFS also favored the adjuvant group (HR: 0.545; 95% CI: 0.458-0.649; p < 0.0001), with a 2-year RFS of 67% (95% CI: 63-70) and 45% (95% CI: 40-50) in the control group. Conclusions: Adjuvant treatment appears to provide an OS benefit in patients with resected stage III melanoma in real-world settings. Further research is required as age-related differences may influence prognosis.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 9576-9576
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

C

Charlee Nardin

Université de Franche-Comté, Inserm 1098 RIGHT, Besançon, France

T

Théo Erard

University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besancon, France

M

Mona Amini Adle

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

H

Henri Montaudie

Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France

J

Julie Charles

M

Marc Puyraveau

Centre de Méthodologie Clinique, CHU, Besançon, France

G

Geraldine Jeudy

Department of Dermatology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France

P

Philippe Bernard

CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France

F

Florent Grange

CH de Valence, Valence, France

D

Delphine Legoupil

Dermatology Department, CHRU Brest, Brest, France

O

Ouidad Zehou

APHP Henri Mondor, Dermatology, Créteil, France

P

Philippe Célérier

Dermatology Department, La Rochelle-Ré-Aunis Hospital Group, La Rochelle, France

C

Candice Lesage

Dermatology Departement, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

F

François Aubin

Groupe Infectiologie et Infections Sexuellement Transmissibles (GrIDIST) of the French Society of Dermatology, Paris

A

Amir Khammari

Oncodermatology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France

G

Gaëlle Quereux

Dermatology Department, Nantes University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1413, Immunologie et Nouveaux Concepts en Immunothérapie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1302, Nantes, France