Surgical versus conservative treatment of odontoid fractures in the elderly: A randomized controlled clinical study (SCORE)

A Arthur Wagner C Carolin Albrecht S Sophie Dittmer S Silvia Egert-Schwender V Victoria Kehl R Rita Stichling G Gisela Klatt B Barbara Ettinger N Nils Hecht P Peter Vajkoczy A Alexander Wengert F Frank Kandziora N Nicolas Heinz von der Höh C Christoph-Eckhard Heyde P Philipp Hartung M Marcus Richter M Maximilian Lenz P Peer Eysel A Andreas Badke C Christian Blume H Hans Clusmann J Johannes Walter S Sandro Krieg P Petros Evangelou E Ehab Shiban M Marc Dreimann O Oliver Gembruch U Ulrich Sure C Christoph Bettag V Veit Rohde A Alexander Disch B Biniam Bekele Y Yu-Mi Ryang A Andreas Kramer F Florian Ringel J Johannes Wach E Erdem Güresir B Bernhard Meyer M Maria Wostrack

Abstract

Background Odontoid fractures of the second cervical vertebra commonly affect elderly patients due to osteoporosis and low-energy trauma. Treatment is controversial, with prolonged cervical collar immobilization risking non-union and complications, and surgical C1–C2 stabilization involving higher upfront surgical risks. High-level evidence from randomized controlled trials to guide optimal treatment decisions is lacking. The SCORE study aims to determine whether surgical stabilization is non-inferior to conservative collar management in maintaining functional independence for elderly patients with unstable odontoid fractures. Methods SCORE is a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial enrolling 322 patients aged ≥70 years with acute (≤2 weeks) unstable odontoid Type II, III, or atypical fractures. Participants will be randomized 1:1, stratified by center, to receive surgical stabilization via posterior C1–C2 fixation or conservative management with a rigid cervical collar. The primary outcome measure is the change in Barthel Index (BI) from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D), neck pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), neck disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), radiographic fusion, treatment compliance, cross-over rates to surgery, and incidence of adverse and serious adverse events up to 6 months. Follow-ups will take place at 12 weeks and 6 months post-injury, with an additional visit at approximately 2 weeks post-surgery for surgical patients. Analysis will use mixed models for repeated measures, targeting 90% power to detect non-inferiority within a 5-point margin on the BI (one-sided α = 0.025), accounting for 15% attrition. Discussion This trial addresses a critical evidence gap by directly comparing surgical and conservative treatments, aiming to guide clinical decision-making and improve functional outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06961578

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 12
Published December 23, 2025
Pages e0337999
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (39)

A

Arthur Wagner

C

Carolin Albrecht

S

Sophie Dittmer

S

Silvia Egert-Schwender

V

Victoria Kehl

R

Rita Stichling

G

Gisela Klatt

B

Barbara Ettinger

N

Nils Hecht

P

Peter Vajkoczy

A

Alexander Wengert

F

Frank Kandziora

N

Nicolas Heinz von der Höh

C

Christoph-Eckhard Heyde

P

Philipp Hartung

M

Marcus Richter

M

Maximilian Lenz

P

Peer Eysel

A

Andreas Badke

C

Christian Blume

H

Hans Clusmann

J

Johannes Walter

S

Sandro Krieg

P

Petros Evangelou

E

Ehab Shiban

M

Marc Dreimann

O

Oliver Gembruch

U

Ulrich Sure

C

Christoph Bettag

V

Veit Rohde

A

Alexander Disch

B

Biniam Bekele

Y

Yu-Mi Ryang

A

Andreas Kramer

F

Florian Ringel

J

Johannes Wach

E

Erdem Güresir

B

Bernhard Meyer

M

Maria Wostrack