Summer and nonsummer climatic signals in speleothem δ <sup>18</sup> O revealed by loess microcodium δ <sup>18</sup> O in East Asia
Abstract
Speleothem δ 18 O records from central southern China have long been regarded as a key benchmark for Asian summer monsoon intensity. However, the similar δ 18 O minima observed among precession minima and their link to seasonal precipitation mixing remains unclear. Here, we present a 400,000-y record of summer precipitation δ 18 O from loess microcodium, which captures distinct precession cycles similar to those seen in speleothem δ 18 O records, particularly during glacial periods. Notably, our microcodium δ 18 O record reveals very low-δ 18 O values during precession minima at peak interglacials, a feature absent in speleothem δ 18 O records from central southern China. This discrepancy suggests that the mixed summer and nonsummer climatic signals substantially influence the speleothem δ 18 O records from central southern China. Proxy-model comparisons indicate that the lack of very low-δ 18 O values in speleothem δ 18 O records is due to an attenuated summer signal contribution, resulting from a lower summer-to-annual precipitation ratio in southern China at strong monsoon intervals. Our findings offer a potential explanation for the long-standing puzzle of the absence of 100- and 41-kyr cycles in speleothem δ 18 O records and underscore the critical role of seasonality in interpreting paleoclimatic proxies in central southern China. These insights also have broader implications for interpreting speleothem δ 18 O records globally, advocating for a more multiseason interpretive framework.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (21)
Zeke Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhengyu Liu
Department of Geography, Ohio State University
Gaojun Li
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University
Yanjun Cai
Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University
Qin Wen
School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University
Hai Cheng
Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University
R. Lawrence Edwards
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota
Jing Lei
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Heng Liu
Zhaowei Jing
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University
Tao Li
Steven C. Clemens
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University
Yongjin Wang
School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University
Youbin Sun
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhengguo Shi
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Liangcheng Tan
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Shugang Kang
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xulong Wang
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhangdong Jin
Weijian Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhisheng An
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences