Structured electrolytes facilitate Grotthuss-type transport for enhanced proton-coupled electron transfer reactions
Abstract
Concentrated hydrogen-bonded electrolytes (CoHBEs) are structured, electrochemically stable, less-volatile alternatives to aqueous and dilute nonaqueous electrolytes, however, with high viscosities that limit molecular diffusion. This work provides an understanding of the proton conduction mechanism in CoHBEs based on mixtures of acids and azoles and establishes a link between the structurally dictated transport properties and the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reaction rates that can be leveraged for enhancing electrochemical reactions. Diffusion and relaxation NMR studies suggest a breaking of the viscosity–conductivity tradeoff, where at high azole concentrations (>45 mol%), Grotthuss transport is more likely with lowered proton transfer energy barriers between the azole and the acid according to the machine learning (ML) accelerated ab initio path integral MD (AI-PIMD) simulations. Proton conduction pathways are found to be switchable between the hydrogen bonding networks of the acid and the azole, with imidazole chain forming structures better facilitating Grotthuss hopping. Supported by small-angle neutron scattering studies, the chains are found to have six member molecules on average with maximum of 3 to 4 imidazole/imidazoliums at 50 to 60 mol%. Despite their high viscosities, the measured PCET rates for quinones and phenazines measured in the protic CoHBEs present relatively high electron transfer rate constants (k 0 ~ 10 − 4 cm/s), validated by rotating disc electrode and scanning electrochemical microscopy measurements. The results demonstrate that strategic tuning of hydrogen-bond donor–acceptor interactions enables the decoupling of proton transport and viscosity, thereby impacting PCET reactions.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (17)
Miguel Muñoz
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University
Michael S. Chen
Department of Chemistry, New York University
Giselle de Araujo Lima e Souza
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, City University of New York
Thomas Simunovic
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee
Vaishali Khokhar
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University
Peisen Qian
Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Jesse Wainright
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University
Robert Savinell
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University
Andrew Parnell
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield
Steven Parnell
ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Rachel C. Kilbride
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Thomas A. Zawodzinski
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee
Mark Dadmun
Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee
Steven G. Greenbaum
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, City University of New York
Joaquín Rodríguez-López
Department of Chemistry
Mark Tuckerman
Department of Chemistry, New York University
Burcu Gurkan
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering