Structure-based discovery of positive allosteric modulators of the A <sub>1</sub> adenosine receptor
Abstract
Allosteric modulation of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an exciting strategy for developing new therapeutic agents, and it has several advantages over more commonly used orthosteric drugs. Recently determined GPCR structures have revealed allosteric pockets facing the lipid bilayer, enabling rational drug design. Here, we develop a virtual screening strategy to discover ligands of extrahelical binding pockets and apply this approach to the adenosine A 1 receptor (A 1 R). The A 1 R is a high-value therapeutic target for ischemia–reperfusion injury and chronic neuropathic pain. Developing effective A 1 R therapeutics remains challenging due to high structural conservation across orthosteric binding sites and on-target unwanted effects stimulated by prototypical A 1 R agonists, such as bradycardia and atrioventricular block. However, A 1 R positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) acting through spatially distinct allosteric sites can fine-tune A 1 R activity with high subtype selectivity and spatiotemporal specificity, thereby overcoming current limitations. A chemical library of 160 million compounds was computationally docked to the allosteric pocket identified in a cryo-EM structure of the A 1 R, and a set of 26 top-ranked compounds were selected for experimental evaluation. Pharmacological evaluation of these, and structure-guided hit optimization, led to the discovery of subtype-selective A 1 R PAMs. These compounds demonstrated minimal allosteric agonism and negligible impact on A 1 R-mediated beat rate of an orthosteric agonist. The discovered PAMs pave the way for potential treatments for neuropathic pain and ischemia–reperfusion injury without accompanying side effects. Our results demonstrate the utility of a synergistic computational and experimental approach in GPCR drug discovery.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (16)
Anh T. N. Nguyen
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Nicolas Panel
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University
Duc Duy Vo
Department of Chemistry-Biomedical Centre (BMC), Uppsala University
Bui San Thai
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Ling Yeong Chia
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Cam Sinh Lu
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Shane D. Hellyer
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Monica Langiu
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Manuela Jörg
Medicinal Chemistry Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Karen J. Gregory
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Jan Kihlberg
Department of Chemistry-Biomedical Centre (BMC), Uppsala University
Paul J. White
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Peter J. Scammells
Medicinal Chemistry Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Arthur Christopoulos
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
Jens Carlsson
Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University
Lauren T. May
Drug Discovery Biology Theme, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University