Stratos: An AI-driven biomarker signature for prognostic risk stratification in transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy - a nationwide, multicenter study
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) represents a critical complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with substantial morbidity and mortality risks. Current diagnostic and prognostic approaches rely predominantly on individual laboratory parameters and clinical criteria and lack comprehensive predictive models that integrate multiple inflammatory and hemolytic biomarkers. The heterogeneous clinical presentation, variable treatment responses, and complex pathophysiology of TA-TMA necessitate more sophisticated AI-driven risk stratification approaches. We investigated whether an unsupervised machine learning model, by incorporating pre- and early post-transplant inflammatory and endothelial injury signatures, could stratify patients into distinct subgroups to predict clinical outcomes, particularly mortality, more accurately than conventional methods. Methods This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study enrolled adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT and were subsequently diagnosed with TA-TMA across multiple transplant centers from January 2015 to December 2023. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed and classified according to the 2023 international harmonized diagnostic criteria. The primary cohort comprised 847 patients from our center, with external validation performed in 238 patients from independent centers. We developed STRATOS (STRAtification Tool for TA-TMA OutcomeS), an unsupervised quantitative model integrating eight laboratory biomarkers capturing hemolysis, thrombosis, and complement activation: soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9), schistocyte ratio, LDH, platelet count, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, haptoglobin, and total bilirubin. The model utilized t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) for dimensionality reduction and K-means clustering for patient stratification. The primary endpoint for prognostic evaluation was 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM). Results Among the 847 patients in the primary cohort (median age, 45 years; 58% male), the median onset of TA-TMA was day +57 post-transplantation. Baseline characteristics at diagnosis revealed a median platelet count of 28×10⁹/L, LDH level of 445 U/L, and schistocyte percentage of 2.1%. t-SNE dimensionality reduction and K-means clustering identified three distinct phenotypic clusters with significantly different mortality risks. Cluster 1 (Severe Endothelial Injury, n=189), characterized by extremely high sC5b-9 levels, marked elevation in LDH, and severe thrombocytopenia, represented the highest-risk patients with the poorest prognosis. Cluster 0 (Hemolytic-Dominant, n=312), defined by pronounced hemolytic markers but moderate complement activation, represented the intermediate-risk group. Cluster 2 (Compensated, n=346), exhibiting relatively preserved hemoglobin and only mild-to-moderate abnormalities in biomarkers, had the best prognosis. In the validation cohort, the risk stratification derived from STRATOS demonstrated excellent performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 for predicting 1-year NRM. This significantly outperformed assessment based on individual markers (LDH alone: AUC, 0.64; platelet count: AUC, 0.59; p<0.001). Feature importance analysis revealed that sC5b-9 was the most discriminative biomarker for separating the clusters (variability contribution: 0.91), followed by the schistocyte ratio (0.83) and LDH level (0.70). Conclusions This nationwide, multicenter study establishes and validates the first AI-driven biomarker signature for prognostic risk stratification in patients with established TA-TMA. Compared with conventional approaches, STRATOS provides superior prognostic accuracy for mortality by identifying three distinct phenotypic clusters with disparate outcomes. Future prospective validation studies are warranted to establish guidelines for the real-time clinical integration of this stratification tool.
Article Details
Authors (36)
Zhuo-Yu An
Liping Dou
Yun He
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Natural Product Synthesis and Drug Research, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Xiaolu Zhu
Hai-Xia Fu
Qiusha Huang
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China. National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cell and Gene Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies, Peking University, Beijing, China
Peng Zhao
Meng Lv
Yuanyuan Zhang
Jun Kong
Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research
Yuqian Sun
Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Porous Materials for Separation and Conversion, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Advanced Institute for Future Energy
Feng-Rong Wang
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China. National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cell and Gene Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies, Peking University, Beijing, China
Xiaodong Mo
3Peking University People's Hospital & Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, 100044, China., Beijing, China
Xiangyu Zhao
Wei Han
Huan Chen
Yao Chen
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations
Chenhua Yan
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China. National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cell and Gene Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies, Peking University, Beijing, China
Jingzhi Wang
Ting-ting Han
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Yuhong Chen
Yi-Fei Cheng
Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Chemistry
Yujun Dong
Yi Chen
Lu Ying
Zhongxing Jiang
14The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Xiaoyu Zhu
Shunqing WANG
2Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Department of Hematology, Guangzhou, China
Xiaojing Yan
Xi Zhang
Daihong Liu
1Department of Hematology, Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Ying-Jun Chang
Yu Wang
Lan-Ping Xu
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China. National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cell and Gene Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies, Peking University, Beijing, China
Xiaojun Huang
Xiaohui Zhang