Stereodynamics of cold HD and D2 collisions with He

B Bikramaditya Mandal (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada 1 , Las Vegas, Nevada 89154,) K Konrad Patkowski (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University 2 , Auburn, Alabama 36849,) P Pablo G. Jambrina (Departamento de Química Física, University of Salamanca 3 , Salamanca 37008,) F F. Javier Aoiz (Departamento de Química Física, Universidad Complutense 1 , Madrid 28040,) N Naduvalath Balakrishnan (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada 2 , Las Vegas, Nevada 89154,)

Abstract

We present a comprehensive quantum mechanical study of stereodynamic control of HD + He and D2 + He collisions that have been probed experimentally by Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] using Stark-induced adiabatic Raman passage (SARP) techniques. Our calculations utilize a highly accurate full-dimensional H2 + He interaction potential with diagonal Born–Oppenheimer correction appropriate for HD and D2 isotopomers. The results show that rotational quenching of HD from j = 2 → j′ = 0 in v = 2, j = 2 → j′ = 1 in v = 2 and v = 4, and j = 4 → j′ = 3 in v = 4 is dominated by an l = 1 shape resonance located between 0.1 and 1.0 cm−1. For collision energies less than 0.1 cm−1, isotropic scattering prevails. An l = 1 resonance centered around 0.02 cm−1 is also found to dominate the j = 2 → j′ = 0 and j = 4 → j′ = 2 transitions in v = 4 for He–D2 collisions consistent with our prior studies of Δj = −2 transition in He + D2(v = 2, j = 2) collisions. Our analysis does not support the hypothesis of Perreault et al. [J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10912 (2022)] that a strong l = 2 resonance controls the angular distribution for Δj = −2 transition for both systems. Despite improvements in the development of the potential energy surface, a good agreement with SARP experiments for v = 2 is achieved only when contributions from collision energies less than 1.0 cm−1 were excluded in the computation of velocity averaged differential rate coefficients for both systems. This could be due to some uncertainties in the velocity spread in the experiment that employs co-propagation of the collision partners and possibly, the neglect of transverse velocities in the simulation of the experiment.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 162, Issue 10
Published March 14, 2025
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (5)

B

Bikramaditya Mandal

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada 1 , Las Vegas, Nevada 89154,

K

Konrad Patkowski

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University 2 , Auburn, Alabama 36849,

P

Pablo G. Jambrina

Departamento de Química Física, University of Salamanca 3 , Salamanca 37008,

F

F. Javier Aoiz

Departamento de Química Física, Universidad Complutense 1 , Madrid 28040,

N

Naduvalath Balakrishnan

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Nevada 2 , Las Vegas, Nevada 89154,