STAT-C, an innovative training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders: A case study for spontaneous scaling in primary care

D Diogo Mochcovitch R Robert K. D. McLean A Andrew Milat C Cynthia Cameron A Annie Plamondon R Roberta de Carvalho Corôa J Jeanne Champagne A Amédé Gogovor A Ali Ben Charif M Marie Cimon G Geneviève Roch M Maxine Dumas Pilon J Jean-Sébastien Paquette F France Légaré

Abstract

Background Scaling primary care innovations to benefit broader populations is a key priority for decision-makers. While the science of effective scaling evolves, little is known about innovations that scale spontaneously , i.e., without deliberate guidance. Objectives To assess the spontaneous scaling process of STAT-C, a training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders, and its perceived effects on primary care services and beneficiaries. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods descriptive single-case study using an Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach involving patient users. The case was defined as the spontaneous scaling of STAT-C, presented at the Quebec College of Family Physicians’ Innovation Symposium and assessed using a selection criteria checklist. Over one year, we observed the scaling process through monthly meetings with the innovation team and collected documents to retrace key steps. We conducted interviews with decision-makers, healthcare professionals, and end-users, along with a focus group with the innovation team. Data were analyzed thematically using documents, interviews, and meetings. The scaling process was examined using the Scaling Impact principles: justification, optimal scale, coordination, and dynamic evaluation. Results STAT-C met 71% of selection criteria. Fourteen participants were interviewed: innovation team (n = 2), healthcare professionals (n = 5), decision-makers (n = 4), and end-users (n = 3). Technical justifications included the need to standardize information across professionals (n = 10), while moral ones emphasized alignment with patient values (n = 8). Interviews revealed limited awareness of dynamic evaluation and a lack of indicators supporting further scaling. Ethical rationales reflected goal-oriented and duty-based reasoning. Preliminary data suggested improvements in healthcare professionals’ self-reported competence in managing CMHD-related sick leave, offering early indications of the innovation’s relevance. Conclusion This study highlights strategies, challenges, and outcomes of spontaneous scaling under real-world conditions, showing how pathways emerge, strategies evolve, and ethical dimensions shape decision-making.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 21, Issue 6
Published June 25, 2026
Pages e0351937
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (14)

D

Diogo Mochcovitch

R

Robert K. D. McLean

A

Andrew Milat

C

Cynthia Cameron

A

Annie Plamondon

R

Roberta de Carvalho Corôa

J

Jeanne Champagne

A

Amédé Gogovor

A

Ali Ben Charif

M

Marie Cimon

G

Geneviève Roch

M

Maxine Dumas Pilon

J

Jean-Sébastien Paquette

F

France Légaré