STAR-01: A randomized phase III clinical trial comparing PD-1 combined with apatinib and SOX,PD-1 combined with SOX, versus SOX alone in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

L Leping Li (State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Crystal Materials School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering Tianjin University of Technology Tianjin China) L Liang Shang C Changqing Jing K Kun Xiao L Lei Cong (Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China) C Cong Sun H Haiyan Jing (Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China) H Honghai Dai (Tumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China) Y Yubo Liu D Dan Sha (Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Cancer, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China) H Hongjun Liu (Vanderbilt University , , , ,) X Xiaoqiao Zhang (Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to the Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China)

Abstract

e16070 Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors. With the recent research, it has been found that positive conversion therapy can benefit the survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer(AGC). Although more and more studies are exploring treatment options for AGC, the survival prognosis of advanced gastric cancer was still poor. Methods: The research attempted to compare the R0 resection rate, pathological complete response rate (pCR rate), disease response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), 3-year disease free survival(DFS) and safety of three conversion therapies: PD-1 combined with apatinib and SOX(Group A), PD-1 combined with SOX(Group B), and SOX alone(Group C) in patients AGC. Our study enrolled 102 advanced patients, 96 of whom completed the study. Patients in all 3 groups received 4 cycles of conversion therapy and were evaluated for surgery based on the results of imaging evaluation. 4 cycles of conventional chemotherapy were performed after surgery. The study Registration Number was ChiCTR2000028845. Results: Of the 96 patients treated with the study approach, 11 had an radio-graphic Complete Remission(4 in Group A, 6 in B, and 1 in C). The Objective Response Rate(ORR) of the 4-drug(84.4%) and 3-drug(69.7%) combination groups were significantly better than that of the SOX alone group(45.2%). P(ABC) = 0.004, P(A-B) = 0.160, P(A-C) = 0.001, P(B-C) = 0.047. The results of Disease Control Rate was identical to ORR: Group A(87.5%) and Group B(87.9%) were significantly better than Group C(64.5%). P(ABC) = 0.029, P(A-B) = 1.000, P(A-C) = 0.032, P(B-C) = 0.027.After 4cycles of conversion therapy, 69 patients(24 in A, 25 in B, and 20 in C) underwent surgical treatment and 48 patients of them achieved R0 resection(18 in A, 16 in B, and 14 in C).It was disappointing that R0 resection rates were not statistically different among the three groups,P(ABC) = 0.704, P(A-B) = 0.404, P(A-C) = 0.711, P(B-C) = 0.671).There were 9 patients(2 in A, 6 in B, and 1 in C) got Pathologic Complete Response,P(ABC) = 0.124,P(A-B) = 0.273, P(A-C) = 1.000, P(B-C) = 0.182.The overall survival of the 3groups was respectively 24.63 , 26.36 and 16.06 months. Disease-free survival was 20.06 , 23.17 and 11.78 months. The survival of the 3-drug and 4-drug groups is significantly better than that of the SOX group, but the 4-drug group has no survival advantage than the 3-drug group.The adverse events between the 3 groups were not statistically significant, so the safety of the 3-drug combination and the 4-drug combination was assured. Conclusions: In conversion therapy for advanced gastric cancer, the combination of PD-1+SOX could improve ORR, pCR, R0 resection rate and survival expectation of patients compared with SOX alone. However, whether apatinib is introduced or not can not improve the ORR rate and survival of patients. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000028845 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

L

Leping Li

State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Crystal Materials School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering Tianjin University of Technology Tianjin China

L

Liang Shang

C

Changqing Jing

K

Kun Xiao

L

Lei Cong

Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China

C

Cong Sun

H

Haiyan Jing

Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China

H

Honghai Dai

Tumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China

Y

Yubo Liu

D

Dan Sha

Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Cancer, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China

H

Hongjun Liu

Vanderbilt University , , , ,

X

Xiaoqiao Zhang

Department of General Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to the Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China