Stage-specific circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) positivity and minimal residual disease (MRD) decision making in colorectal cancer (CRC) in the prospective INTERCEPT program.
Abstract
3623 Background: ctDNA positivity is a strong prognostic biomarker for recurrence after curative-intent procedures for CRC and defines MRD in the absence of radiographic disease. Our aim was to assess stage-specific positivity rates across follow-up intervals and the clinical actions associated with ctDNA+. Methods: The INTERCEPT program enrolled patients undergoing curatively intended procedures for stage I-IV CRC at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Tumor informed MRD assays (Signatera) were drawn postoperatively and every 3 months according to reimbursement guidelines. ctDNA draws were grouped into 6-month intervals from completion of definitive therapy. Clinical decisions after the first ctDNA+ result in the MRD window were classified as: MRD-trial, systemic therapy, diagnostic escalation, early follow-up, ctDNA confirmation, or no change. Results: The final cohort included 1,603 patients (40% stage IV, 32% stage III, 20% stage II, 8% stage I). Median follow-up was 18.4 months. Patients that were ctDNA- on first post-definitive draw had longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than ctDNA+ patients (median RFS 62.6 vs 4.8 months, HR 11.6 [95% CI 9.6-14.1]), remaining significant in stage subgroups. Among all patients 28% were ctDNA+ at any post-definitive timepoint, the rates were highest for stage IV, followed by stage III, II, and I (Table). ctDNA+ rates were highest in early follow-up and got lower at later intervals (21% to 5%), with similar patterns for all stages. Among 271 patients that were ctDNA+ in the MRD window the initial therapeutic approach was MRD trial screening for 59 (22%), diagnostic escalation in 73 (18%), early follow-up in 57 (21%), confirmation of ctDNA+ by repeat testing in 23 (8%), no change in management for 38 (14%), and 21 (8%) patients started other systemic therapy. MRD trials were discussed prior to recurrence with 144 (53%) of the patients. Conclusions: ctDNA positivity is more common in higher stage tumors and becomes less frequent during follow-up. ctDNA positivity confirms its established prognostic value and meaningfully impacts clinical management, including diagnostic workup and MRD trial enrollment. Even within a single center, heterogeneity in initial management of ctDNA+ patients and timing for MRD trial enrollment is evident. Stage-specific ctDNA+ rates during follow-up after definitive therapy. All Stage IV Stage III Stage II Stage I p Any time 444 / 1,603 (28%) 313 / 646 (48%) 87 / 513 (17%) 40 / 322 (12%) 4 / 122 (3%) <0.001 <6 months 329 / 1603 (21%) 249 / 646 (39%) 57 / 513 (11%) 21 / 322 (7%) 2 / 122 (2%) <0.001 6 to <12 months 151 / 1,018 (15%) 97 / 349 (28%) 36 / 351 (10%) 17 / 230 (7%) 1 / 88 (1%) <0.001 12 to <18 months 75 / 672 (11%) 50 / 197 (25%) 15 / 250 (6%) 10 / 161 (6%) 0 / 64 (0%) <0.001 18 to <24 months 16 / 264 (6%) 10 / 71 (14%) 3 / 94 (3%) 3 / 71 (4%) 0 / 28 (0%) 0.019 ≥24 months 9 / 147 (6%) 5 / 41 (12%) 2 / 58 (3%) 1 / 33 (3%) 1 / 15 (7%) 0.259
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Emerik Osterlund
Giulia Maddalena
Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
Guglielmo Vetere
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kathryn Aziz
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Robert J. Kell
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Logan White
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Dylan N. Gil
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mahmoud M.G. Yousef
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kristin Alfaro
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Christine Parseghian
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Neha Agrawal
Tsuyoshi Konishi
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Timothy E. Newhook
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Xiling Shen
John Paul Y.C. Shen
Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Michael J. Overman
Van K. Morris
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Arvind Dasari
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Scott Kopetz
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston