Spatiotemporal and genetic tracking of long-term persisting CAR-T cells following ciltacabtagene autoleucel treatment for multiple myeloma reveals molecular insights into late-onset toxicities
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is an anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy which led to >70% complete response (CR) rates in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Long-term (LT) persisting CAR-T cells may influence both remission durability and adverse events (AE), yet cellular kinetics are heterogeneous across patients. Here, we investigated the impact of LT persisting CAR-T cells in MM patients following cilta-cel treatment. Methods Flow cytometry-based immune monitoring in peripheral blood (PB) comprising CAR-T cell quantification was performed at days 0 (D0), 4, 7, 14, and 30, and months 3 (M3), 6, 12, 18, and 24 following cilta-cel infusion. In total, 36 patients with maximum expansion (cmax) >101 CAR-T cells/µL and ≥1 immune monitoring ≥M6 (median: 7 time points, range: 5-10) were included. Single-cell RNA/TCR-seq of PB mononuclear cells was available at D30 (n=27) and M3 (n=20) for 29 patients, and of isolated CAR-T cells at D30 (n=3) and ≥M6 (n=6) for 4 patients. For these, whole exome sequencing (WES) of CAR-T cells at ≥M6 was conducted. Spatial transcriptomics of intestinal biopsies from 2 patients was performed using the Visium HD technology. Results CAR-T cells were detected for a median of 66 days (14–729) post-infusion. LT persisters (LTP) were defined by CAR-T detection in PB ≥M6 (median: 389 days, 248-729), which was observed in 13/36 (36%) patients. 23/36 (64%) had earlier CAR-T clearance (median: 29 days, 14-99) and were classified as short-term persisters (STP). CAR-T counts in LTP around M12 demonstrated substantial variability, with a median of 14 (3-960) CAR-T/µL. Initial peak expansion occurred after a median of 14 (7–30) days with a median cmax of 498 (10-8011) CAR-T/µL. There was no difference regarding cmax between LTP and STP (median: 510 vs 404 CAR-T/µL, p=0.13). All LTP and 16/23 (70%) STP achieved CR post-infusion, while the remaining 7/23 (30%) had a very good partial response. After a median follow-up of 12 (6–24) months, median progression-free and overall survival were not reached in both groups. Time to B-cell recovery (>0 B-cells/µL; median: not reached vs 3 months, p<0.001) and T-helper cell recovery (≥200 endogenous CD4+/µL; median: 16 vs 6 months, p<0.001) were significantly longer in LTP vs STP. 6/13 LTP (46%) and 5/23 STP (22%) developed late-onset (≥D30) grade ≥2 AEs (p=0.15): 5/13 LTP had neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia, which resolved in 3/5 patients at M3. One LTP developed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-like enterocolitis. Spatial transcriptomics of intestinal biopsies around M12 of this patient (n=3 biopsies) and another LTP (n=1) who had failure to thrive but no IBD-like symptoms, revealed only sparse CAR-T infiltration (<0.1%) in the terminal ileum in the absence of enterocolitis, whereas CAR-T cells made up 1.6% of cells in a duodenal sample of the first patient. CAR-T cells were enriched in the lamina propria and colocalized with stromal, dendritic cell and macrophage populations. Single-cell data revealed temporal changes in CAR-T cell composition: Overall, CD8+CD45RA+ effector memory (EM) CAR-T cells were more abundant in STP vs LTP at D30 and M3 (p=0.01). At M3, there was an enrichment in CD4+ memory, CD4+ cytotoxic, and CD8+ EM CAR-T cells in LTP (p<0.01). CAR-T lineage tracing in 4 LTP from D30 to ≥M6 revealed that 1/4 had monoclonal (90% of CAR-T), 1/4 oligoclonal (8 CD8+ clones ≥1% of CAR-T), and 2/4 polyclonal TCR rearrangements. Oligoclonal CAR-T cells remained stable in frequency over time. Atypical CD4-CD8- monoclonal CAR-T cells emerged at M3 and re-expanded, making up 66% of CD3+ (510 CAR-T/µL) at M12. WES indicated two TP53 mutations (p.T125M and p.R249S) and one NF1 mutation (c.480-1G>A) with 38%, 40%, and 31% variant allele frequencies (VAF), respectively. The two TP53 mutations were already present at 4% and 2% VAF in whole blood at leukapheresis. Another patient with polyclonal memory CD4+ CAR-T cells at M12 harbored a TP53 (p.R306*) mutation at 10% VAF. Conclusion LTP and STP showed no significant difference in survival, however LTP experienced prolonged B-cell and endogenous T-lineage suppression, and 46% had late-onset AEs. Lineage tracing revealed an unexpected diversity of LT persisting CAR-T phenotypes and clonal trajectories. Two LTP harbored somatic TP53 mutations in CAR-T cells. These findings emphasize the importance of LT immuno-genetic monitoring to identify patients at risk for treatment-related complications.
Article Details
Authors (37)
David Fandrei
2Institut Gustave Roussy, Computational Clinical Oncology Lab, UMR 981, Villejuif, France
Sabine Seiffert
5University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Christina Kuhn
Michael Rade
2Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Esmée van Vliet
5University Medical Center Utrecht, Center for Translational Immunology, Utrecht, Netherlands
Vera von Landenberg-Roberg
Manja Meggendorfer
46Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
Luise Fischer
2Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Markus Kreuz
Dennis Löffler
2Fraunhofer IZI, Leipzig, Germany
Conny Blumert
2Department of Medical Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Anja Grahnert
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Maik Friedrich
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Patrick Born
1University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Thomas Wiemers
Emilie-Charlot Skerbek
1University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectiology, Leipzig, Germany
Kathrin Jäger
8University of Leipzig, Cytometry Core Facility, Leipzig, Germany
Sebastian Greiser
2Fraunhofer IZI, Leipzig, Germany
Ronny Baber
Song-Yau Wang
2Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Simone Heyn
19University of Leipzig Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapies, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
Georg-Nikolaus Franke
4Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Andreas Boldt
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Dominik Schmiedel
2Fraunhofer IZI, Leipzig, Germany
Sebastian Böttcher
Clinic III (Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine), Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
Marco Herling
Jürgen Kuball
Marietta Truger
2MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
Torsten Haferlach
7Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
Jan Krönke
Uwe Platzbecker
Klaus Metzeler
4Department of Hematology, Cell Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Ulrike Koehl
1Department of Cell and Gene Therapy Development, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Vladan Vucinic
15University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
Zsolt Sebestyén
Kristin Reiche
Maximillian Merz
5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States