Sourcing the origins of carnelian in early Chinese civilizations

M Meiting Yan (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) J Jiancheng Liu (Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology) C Chunlei Qin (Beijing Bead Museum) X Xuemei He (School of Gemmology, China University of Geosciences) X Xiaoguang Li (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) J Jian Yu (Department of Chemistry) R Ruilin Mao H Hongye Han (Beijing Institute of Archaeology) Z Zhanwei Sun (Shaanxi Academy of Archaeology) C Chong Wang Z Zhenbin Xie (Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology) H Honglin Ran (Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology) F Fei Tang (Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology) J Jonathan Mark Kenoyer (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Z Zihua Tang (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Carnelian beads in high-status burials of the Western Zhou period (ca. 1000–800 BCE) have long been seen as key evidence for long-distance exchange between East Asia and regions to the west, while their geological origins and circulation pathways have remained poorly constrained. Using a newly established geochemical database of 300 geological samples from 27 potential sources across Asia, we conducted trace-element analyses of 11 carnelian beads from the Sanxingdui pits (ca. 1200–1000 BCE), Sichuan Basin, southwest China. Canonical discriminant analysis indicates that the raw materials of these carnelian beads do not primarily derive from south China, but the Yanshan Orogeny, Central Asian Orogenic Belt and some unknown sources that might be close to Hexi Corridor, pointing to raw-material sources located over 1,000 km to the north of the Sichuan Basin. Comparative analyses of contemporaneous beads from Gansu, Shaanxi, and Beijing show similar northern provenance signatures, suggesting a broad and persistent exchange sphere spanning the southern Mongolian Plateau, Loess Plateau, eastern Tibetan Plateau, Central Plains, and Sichuan Basin between 1500–1000 BCE. Our results provide the earliest direct geochemical evidence for long-distance carnelian exchange in Bronze Age China and demonstrate the value of integrating geochemical sourcing with archaeological context to reconstruct ancient interaction networks.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 7
Published February 17, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (15)

M

Meiting Yan

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

J

Jiancheng Liu

Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology

C

Chunlei Qin

Beijing Bead Museum

X

Xuemei He

School of Gemmology, China University of Geosciences

X

Xiaoguang Li

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

J

Jian Yu

Department of Chemistry

R

Ruilin Mao

H

Hongye Han

Beijing Institute of Archaeology

Z

Zhanwei Sun

Shaanxi Academy of Archaeology

C

Chong Wang

Z

Zhenbin Xie

Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology

H

Honglin Ran

Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology

F

Fei Tang

Sichuan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology

J

Jonathan Mark Kenoyer

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Z

Zihua Tang

State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences