Social factors and severity of phenotypic frailty in the Elevate longitudinal cohort of older adults with early-stage breast cancer.

C Christina Ahn Minami (Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Breast Oncology Program, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA) H Hillary Heiling (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) N Nabihah Tayob M Melissa E. Hughes S Seán Ryan (Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics) C Craig Snow (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) E Erin Cunniff (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) D Danielle Kline (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) R Ruth D. Feliz Lima (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) K K.M. Steve Lo (Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT) M Mary Anne Fenton (Department of Hematology/Oncology Brown University Health Cancer Institute Providence Rhode Island USA) S Sarah Sinclair D Demetria Joy Smith-Graziani (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) J Jeanna Hamilton Walsh (New Hampshire Oncology Hematology, Concord, NH) N Natalie Sinclair M Meredith Gail Faggen (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Rachel A. Freedman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA)

Abstract

e13847 Background: Phenotypic frailty is a clear risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality in older breast cancer patients. How social factors may be potentially protective against phenotypic frailty in this population remains unclear. We sought to define these associations at baseline in the Elevate cohort. Methods: The Elevate Longitudinal Cohort study prospectively enrolled patients >70 years with a new invasive non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosis between 4/19/19-9/28/23 from 7 US centers, to participate in 5 years of clinical data, biospecimen and serial survey assessments. Phenotypic frailty was calculated using a 10-item frailty index, categorizing participants as frail, prefrail, or robust. Life expectancy was calculated using the Schonberg Index. Elements of social frailty included education, income, living situation (living alone or with spouse), Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Activity score, and MOS Social Support scores. Descriptive statistics were performed and multivariable modified Poisson analyses were run to estimate relative risk ratios. Results: Of 187 women with complete baseline survey data, the median age was 75.7, and 70% were robust, 22% were prefrail, and 8% were frail; 8% were non-White and 3% were Hispanic. Overall, 33% of frail patients, compared to 90% of robust patients, had a life expectancy > 10 years. Most patients were not married (53%), lived with someone else (63%), did not need help with their instrumental activities of daily living (82%), had some college education or higher (74%), and had a household income of > $40,000 (55%). On univariate analyses, living situation and marital status were not significantly associated with prefrailty or frailty. On multivariable analyses, high income, higher instrumental activities of daily living score and social activity score were associated with a lower likelihood of being prefrail or frail (Table). Conclusions: At diagnosis, specific social elements are significantly associated with a lower risk of phenotypic frailty in older women with early-stage breast cancer, suggesting a potentially protective effect. How social and phenotypic frailty may interact with respect to longitudinal outcomes in the patient population remains to be seen in this cohort. Baseline Characteristic Relative risk for prefrailty or frailty 95% CI Education At least some college vs High school or less 0.71 (0.44, 1.15) Income $40,001--$80,000 vs ≤ $40,000 0.45 (0.26, 0.76) >$80,000 vs ≤ $40,000 0.44 (0.24, 0.82) Prefer not to answer/Missing vs ≤ $40,000 0.36 (0.2, 0.64) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) No help for any IADL items vs At least some help for at least one IADL items 0.34 (0.21, 0.54) MOS social support score* Score increase by 1 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) MOS Social Activity Score* Score increase by 1 0.99 (0.98, 1) Bold: p-value<0.05. *Range 0-100, higher score indicates better social support/activity.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

C

Christina Ahn Minami

Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Breast Oncology Program, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA

H

Hillary Heiling

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

N

Nabihah Tayob

M

Melissa E. Hughes

S

Seán Ryan

Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics

C

Craig Snow

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

E

Erin Cunniff

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

D

Danielle Kline

Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

R

Ruth D. Feliz Lima

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

K

K.M. Steve Lo

Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT

M

Mary Anne Fenton

Department of Hematology/Oncology Brown University Health Cancer Institute Providence Rhode Island USA

S

Sarah Sinclair

D

Demetria Joy Smith-Graziani

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

J

Jeanna Hamilton Walsh

New Hampshire Oncology Hematology, Concord, NH

N

Natalie Sinclair

M

Meredith Gail Faggen

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Rachel A. Freedman

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA