Sintilimab plus oxaliplatin and capecitabine versus sintilimab plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and capecitabine for advanced unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma patients: A prospective, randomized, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial.
Abstract
e16042 Background: The treatment options for locally advanced unresectable GEJ adenocarcinoma are still limited in China. Sintilimab is a PD1 mAb, previous ORIENT-16 study has demonstrated its combination with XELOX regimen had improved OS and tolerable toxicity in first line GEJ carcinoma treatment. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is a form of paclitaxel that does not require steroid premedication to prevent hypersensitivity reactions, which may bring more benefits for this cohort of patients. Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed advanced unresectable GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled and randomly assigned to arm A: sintilimab 200mg, IV, D1, Q3W; capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 , PO, BID, D1-14, Q3W; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 , IV, Q3W; and arm B: albumin-bound paclitaxel 260 mg/m 2 , IV, D1, Q3W, sintilimab and capecitabine dose were the same with arm A. The primary endpoints were ORR and PFS per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of 28 th Dec 2024, 39 patients were enrolled, 23 from arm A and 16 from arm B. In these 2 arms, median age were 69 and 70, male patients accounted for 60.9% and 87.5%, respectively; in arm A, 78.3% subjects had ECOG score 0, 21.7% had score 1, in arm B, they were both 50%; 8.7% subjects in arm A had > = 3 metastatic sites, and that in arm B was 6.3%. 23 arm A and 16 arm B patients were analyzed for safety profile, 39.1% of patients in arm A had any grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the most common (> 10%) was anemia (21.7%),; 43.8% in arm B had any-grade TEAEs, with the most common being hepatic failure (12.5%). 17.4% of patients in arm A had dose interruption/delay, and 17.4% had dose reduction, those in arm B were 18.8% and 0. Immune-related AEs occurred in 4.3% of patients in arm A (hepatic failure) and none in arm B. Efficacy was analyed in 20 patients from arm A and 16 from arm B, the confirmed ORR was 35.0% (7/20, 95% CI 15.4%- 59.2%) and 37.5% (6/16, 95% CI 15.2%- 64.6%), respectively. Disease control rate (DCR) was 85.0% (17/20, 95% CI 62.1%-96.8%) and 93.8% (15/16, 95% CI 69.8%-99.8%), respectively, and the median PFS was 6.74 months (95% CI 4.73-Not reached) in arm A and 7.23 months (95% CI 7.23-Not reached) in arm B. Conclusions: Sintilimab in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel and capecitabine showed similar efficacy with sintilimab plus XELOX, with tolerable toxicity, however, due to limited sample size and follow-up time, it’s hard to draw any solid conclusions, we will continue to observe the safety and efficacy of this regimen in locally advanced unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2300077373 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Kai Chen
Wei Li
Caihua Xu
Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Qing Guo
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Institute of Advanced Technology
Dapeng Li
Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University Hangzhou
Lian Lian
Department of Oncology, Suzhou Xiangcheng People’s Hospital, Suzhou, China
Xiumin Zhou
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Yulan Gu
Wei Fu
Weiming Duan
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Rong Wang
Yonghua Zhang