Single center updated analysis of patients with Relapsed/Refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with linperlisib.
Abstract
Abstract Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) are aggressive malignancies with limited effective treatment options in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) setting. Although targeting the PI3K pathway has shown potential by modulating T-cell signaling and eliciting antitumor activity, clinical application has been limited by significant immune-related toxicities. Linperlisib, a next-generation PI3Kδ inhibitor characterized by high potency and selectivity, with a reduced incidence of off-target toxicities compared to earlier compounds, is approved in China for follicular lymphoma, has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in Chinese patients with r/r PTCL, as evidenced by results from the open-label Phase II trial (NCT05274997) presented last year. Here, we report our single-center experience with linperlisib, including patients enrolled in the clinical trial as well as those who continued therapy through compassionate use as single patient IND. Aims: To evaluate the clinical benefit, safety, and durability of responses to linperlisib in a single center cohort of r/r PTCL and CTCL patients, and to examine outcomes with a step-down maintenance dosing strategy . Pts received linperlisib 80mg QD for four 28-day cycles or achieved a complete response (CR) prior to a prespecified reduction to a 40mg QD continuous maintenance dose. Method: We did analysis of 18 adults with r/r T-cell lymphomas (PTCL-NOS n=8, AITL n=8, ALCL n=1, CTCL n=1) treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Aug 2022–May 2025). Patients received therapy either through an open-label Phase II clinical trial (NCT05274997) or via compassionate use under single-patient IND protocols. Patients received linperlisib 80 mg QD for four 28-day cycles or until complete response (CR), followed by 40 mg QD maintenance. Tumor response was assessed every 2 treatment cycles per Lugano 2014 ( for PTCL) or Olsen criteria (for CTCL). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Pts with CR were eligible to proceed to consolidative transplant, if warranted by investigator review. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by CTCAE v5.0. Results: The median patient age was 64 years with males (9) and females (9) ratio 1:1. ECOG 0 (50%) or 1 (50%), Caucasian 11 (61.1%), Black 6 (33.7%), or Hispanic 1 (5.6%). Patients had a median of 3 prior systemic therapies (range 1–7). ORR was 66% (CR 39%; PR 28%), with highest responses observed in AITL (ORR 75%). Responses most frequently occurred by the first assessment during the 80mg QD dose period. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the cohort was median PFS is 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.0 to 8.5 months), with a median overall survival (mOS) 29.7 months, (95% CI 22.4 to 37.1 months). Median response duration not reached. Among AITL cases, mPFS reached 6.25 months (95% CI 0, 18.9 months). Two of the PTCL pts with CR subsequently received transplant and were censored from the PFS analysis. one CTCL pts achieved a PR and 4 pts had SD and further had PR, later progressed. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild to moderate. Grade 1–2 events included maculopapular rash (55.6%), diarrhea (50.0%), CMV reactivation (11.1%), nausea (22.2%), paresthesia (22.2%), constipation (16.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (11.1%). Severe AEs (Grade ≥3) affected 9 of 18 patients (50.0%), with lung infection being the most frequent (22.2%). Additional Grade 3 events included diarrhea (11.1%), colitis (5.6%), pancreatitis (5.6%), chest pain (5.6%), and peripheral motor neuropathy (5.6%). Fourteen patients discontinued due to progression; three (on compassionate use) remain in remission at analysis cutoff. One patient who proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation died from transplant-related complications. Conclusions: In a heavily pretreated, with r/r PTCL/CTCL, linperlisib demonstrated robust activity with early and durable responses—especially in AITL—and a manageable safety profile, including with step-down dosing. These findings support further exploration of Linperlisib in US population and use of maintenance dosing strategy. Overall the safety profile was manageable, and treatment-related AEs were generally reversible or non-life-threatening.
Article Details
Authors (12)
Ranjit Nair
Sandra Lopez
2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma Myeloma, Houston, United States
Anita Aickareth
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma Myeloma, Houston, United States
David Weaver
Qi Liu
Wendy Xiong
3Yingli Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shangai, China
Luis Malpica
Luis Fayad
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, United States
Jennifer Ramos
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma, Houston, United States
Yago Nieto
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Hematopathology, Houston, United States
Auris Huen
9The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Swami Iyer
15MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States