Single-cell characterization of renal cell carcinoma brain metastasis.
Abstract
e14013 Background: Brain metastasis (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a major clinical challenge and is frequently resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The metabolic, and immunological adaptations that enable tumor survival within the brain microenvironment remain poorly defined. A comprehensive, brain-specific characterization of tumor–microenvironment is urgently needed to understand immune dysfunction and therapeutic resistance in RCC BM. Methods: We generated a large single-nucleus RNA sequencing dataset comprising 184,037 nuclei from 14 RCC brain metastasis (BM) patients, including matched primary kidney tumors (n = 8) and extracranial metastases (n = 5). Cell populations were identified across tumor, immune, and stromal compartments. Comparative analyses were performed to identify BM-specific transcriptional, metabolic, and immune programs. Spatial transcriptomic profiling was conducted on 12 BM samples (13,128 cells) to validate cellular localization and interactions. Ligand–receptor (LR) inference was applied to reconstruct intercellular communications across tumor and microenvironmental cell types. Results: RCC BM is associated with extensive immune remodeling of the brain microenvironment, accompanied by stromal involvement. Tumor cells show neural-like features with evidence of neuronal infiltration, while stromal populations display immunomodulatory phenotypes that shape the immune microenvironment and extend beyond canonical structural roles. This immune landscape is characterized by expansion of immunosuppressive myeloid populations, depletion of antigen-presenting dendritic cells, absence of tertiary lymphoid structures, and CD8⁺ T cells exhibiting terminal exhaustion with impaired proliferative capacity. Across tumor, immune, and stromal compartments, we observed coordinated metabolic shifts including enhanced OXPHOS, and MYC-associated transcriptional programs that are consistent with tumor progression. Spatial profiling and LR analyses confirmed interactions that providing mechanistic insight and informing therapeutic targeting strategies. Conclusions: This study defines RCC BM as biologically distinct tumor entity shaped by neural adaptation, metabolic reprogramming, and profound immune dysfunction. The coordinated emergence of immunosuppressive myeloid signaling, terminal T cell exhaustion, and loss of antigen presentation. This establishes a brain-specific microenvironment that limits the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Together, this work highlights context-dependent therapeutic resistance mechanisms and identifies actionable pathways that may guide the development of effective, brain-tailored immunotherapeutic strategies. Importantly, these findings provided a foundation that directly supported two clinical trials testing lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and zanzalitinib in RCC BM patients.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Mostafa I.H. Ali
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
Zeynep Akpinar
Jose A. Ovando-Ricardez
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
Anna K. Casasent
Department of Hematopoietic Biology & Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Truong Nguyen Anh Lam
Jerome Lin
Department of Systems Biology, Division of Discovery Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Narmina Khanmammadova
Patrick Kevin Reville
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nuvance Health, Norwalk, CT, Norwalk, CT
David J. H. Shih
School of Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Adeboye O. Osunkoya
Departments of Pathology and Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Lisa M. Norberg
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Tuan M. Tran
Department of Biology, University of South Alabama
Sahin Hanalioglu
Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Mehmet Asim Bilen
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Frederick F. Lang
Jason T. Huse
Nicholas Navin
Merve Hasanov
Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
Eric Jonasch
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Elshad Hasanov
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH