Simulation of pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization in the steady state

S Shebha Anandhi Jegadeesan (Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz 1 , Konstanz,) Y Yujie Zhao (Department of Chemistry) G Graham M. Smith (School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews 2 , St Andrews,) I Ilya Kuprov (Department of Chemical and Biological Physics) G Guinevere Mathies (Department of Chemistry)

Abstract

In pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), enhancement of bulk nuclear polarization requires the repeated application of a microwave pulse sequence. So far, analysis of a one-time transfer of electron spin polarization to a dipolar-coupled nuclear spin has guided the design of DNP pulse sequences. This has obvious shortcomings, such as the inability to predict the optimal repetition time. In an actual pulsed DNP experiment, a balance is reached between the polarization arriving from the unpaired electrons and nuclear relaxation. In this article, we explore three algorithms to compute this stroboscopic steady state: (1) explicit time evolution by propagator squaring, (2) generation of an effective propagator using the matrix logarithm, and (3) direct calculation of the steady state with the Newton–Raphson method. Algorithm (2) is numerically unstable in dissipative DNP settings. Algorithms (1) and (3) are both stable; algorithm (3) is the most efficient. We compare the steady-state simulations to existing experimental results at 0.34 and 1.2 T and to the first experimental observation of X-inverse-X (XiX) DNP at 3.4 T. The agreement is good and improves further when electron–proton distance and electron Rabi frequency distributions are accounted for. We demonstrate that the trajectory of the spin system during one-time application of a microwave pulse sequence differs from the steady orbit. This has implications for DNP pulse sequence design.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 163, Issue 3
Published July 21, 2025
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (5)

S

Shebha Anandhi Jegadeesan

Department of Chemistry, University of Konstanz 1 , Konstanz,

Y

Yujie Zhao

Department of Chemistry

G

Graham M. Smith

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews 2 , St Andrews,

I

Ilya Kuprov

Department of Chemical and Biological Physics

G

Guinevere Mathies

Department of Chemistry