Short-term blinatumomab regimen in newly diagnosed induction and MRD-negative consolidation treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Abstract
Abstract Background: Blinatumomab, a bispecific antibody engaging CD3 positive T cells to CD19 positive tumor cells, has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory and minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In recent years, blinatumomab has been increasingly used in newly diagnosed and MRD-negative patients, especially used in a 28-day treatment cycle. Here, we investigated the efficacy of a shorter 14-day regimen and its impact on immune cell dynamics. Methods We conducted a retrospective real-world study of B-ALL patients receiving blinatumomab for induction or MRD-negative consolidation from Jan 2022 to May 2025. Data were collected from two centers. Results In the induction cohort (n=49, median age 41y), there're 11 Ph-positive (Ph+) and 38 Ph-negative (Ph-) cases. Among the Ph+ patients, 7 received a 14-day regimen and 4 received a 28-day regimen; while among the Ph- patients, 35 received a 14-day regimen and 3 received a 28-day regimen. All Ph+ patients underwent blinatumomab combined with TKI for induction therapy, achieving a composite complete remission rate (CRc) of 100%, with 90.1% reaching CMR after one cycle. Ph- patients received blinatumomab either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy/venetoclax for induction therapy, achieving a CRc of 86.5% and MRD negativity in 87.5% of cases. With a median follow-up of 7.5 months, the 2yOS and 2yEFS for Ph+ patients were 100% and 85.71% respectively. For Ph- patients, the 2yOS and 2yEFS were 100% and 31.68% in the 14-day regimen group, and 100% and 66.67% in the 28-day regimen group, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the 14-day and 28-day regimens in Ph+ patients; however, among Ph- patients, blinatumomab monotherapy and the 14-day regimen might be associated with inferior prognosis, which requires validation with a larger sample size. In the consolidation cohort (n=54, median age 46y), there're 28 Ph+ and 26 Ph- cases. The average number of blinatumomab consolidation cycles was 2.4 (range, 1–8) for Ph+ patients and 2.6 (range, 1–15) for Ph- patients. All Ph+ patients received blinatumomab in combination with TKI, among whom 22 received the 14-day regimen and 6 received the 28-day regimen. One out of 28 Ph+ patients experienced MRD reversion after consolidation and subsequently switched to other regimens. The 2yOS for Ph+ patients receiving the 14-day and 28-day regimens was 100% and 94.44% (p=0.56) respectively, while the 2yEFS was 100% and 88.54% (p=0.42). Notably, only one Ph+ patient in this cohort underwent allo-HSCT. Most Ph- patients (23/26) receied blinatumomab monotherapy as consolidation, and 23 received the 14-day regimen and 3 received the 28-day regimen. The 2yOS for Ph- patients receiving the 14-day and 28-day regimens was 100% and 88.54% (p=0.63) respectively, with the 2yEFS was 100% and 78.24% (p=0.40). One Ph- patient experienced MRD reversion, and 9 patients received allo-HSCT. The 2-year OS for Ph- patients with and without allo-HSCT was 100% and 83.92% (p=0.28), with the 2-year EFS was 85.71% and 79.33% (p=0.71). It appears that in the era of targeted therapy, B-ALL patients may achieve favorable outcomes without HSCT. We also analyzed T cell subset dynamics in 9 patients following blinatumomab. All patients exhibited increased PD-1 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and the frequencies of CD8+ naiev T cells, CD8+ effector T cells, and CD8+ memory T cells were expanded, which were consistent with previous reports using 28-day regimen. However, in one non-responder, the proportion of CD8+ effector T cells didn't increased compared with baseline, suggesting that early expansion of CD8+ effector T cells may serve as a predictor of treatment response. Unexpectedly, 8 out of 9 patients showed a shift in CD4+ T cell polarization from Th1 toward Th2/Th17 after treatment. The underlying mechanism remains unclear and needs further investigation. Nonetheless, this observation raises the question of whether restoring Th1 dominance could enhance the anti-leukemic efficacy of blinatumomab. Conclusion Our study suggests that a 14-day blinatumomab regimen may be appropriate for induction and MRD-negative consolidation in Ph+ ALL. For Ph- ALL, a 28-day regimen remains preferred for induction, while 14-day can be considered for MRD-negative consolidation. Moreover, our findings further support that early expansion of CD8+ effector T cells may serve as a predictor of treatment response.
Article Details
Authors (10)
Yile Zhou
1City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Department of Hematological Malignancies Translational Science and Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, Duarte, United States
Liu Ge
2The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Liping Mao
Yinjun Lou
1The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hematology, Hangzhou, China
Hao Ai
2The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Qian Wang
Hongyan Tong
Jie Jin
School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering
Qingsong Yin
2The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Huafeng Wang