Sexual health communication and young-onset cancer (YOC): Healthcare practitioners’ attitudes and practices.
Abstract
12113 Background: Sexual health-related discussions are often challenging for Healthcare Practitioners (HCPs) and patients, making sexual health communication a frequently neglected aspect of cancer care. HCPs’ lack of knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care contributes to greater unmet survivorship needs.We explored HCPs’ attitudes and practices regarding sexual health-related discussions with YOC patients (25yrs–50yrs) to identify barriers and training needs for improving effective communication. Methods: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods design was employed. 160 HCPs working with patients with gastrointestinal and head & neck cancers at the Trinity St James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland were invited to complete an anonymised 23-item online questionnaire. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative responses, and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Results: 52 respondents included; Medical Oncology (46.2%), Surgical Oncology (36.5%), Radiation Oncology (11.5%), Psych-Oncology (5.8%), and Palliative Care (5.8%). 34.6% (18/52) and 25.0% (13/52) reported ‘rarely’ and ‘never’ enquiring about sexual health-related issues during routine consultations. 34.6% (18/52) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ unconfident initiating a sexual health-related discussion, while 5.7% (3/52) reported feeling adequately trained to enquire about sexual health-related issues. 43.1% (22/51) reported feeling ‘somewhat’ knowledgeable regarding the impact of cancer on sexual health, while 52.9% (27/51) reported they do not have sufficient knowledge regarding LGBTQ+ cancer care needs. Whilst 63.5% (33/52) agreed knowing a patient’s sexual orientation and/or gender identity is relevant to their healthcare, 19.2% (10/52) reported asking about sexual orientation in routine practice. Notably, 98.1% (51/52) reported ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ enquiring about gender identity. Common identified barriers included: lack of training or knowledge (76.9% (40/52)), inappropriate time/setting (59.6% (31/52)), HCP discomfort (46.2% (24/52)), and patient discomfort (48.1% (25/52)). There was strong interest in receiving formal sexual health-related education and training, and 75.0% (39/52) believed access to a specialist for advice and/or to whom patients could be referred would increase HCPs confidence. Conclusions: HCPs acknowledged the importance of sexual health-related communication with YOC patients, yet significant gaps exist in knowledge, confidence, and training, particularly regarding the LGBTQ+ population.These findings underscore the need for targeted training and education to empower HCPs to engage in meaningful sexual health communication.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Louise Kelly
Department of Medical Oncology, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Dublin 8, Ireland
Emily Harrold
Department of Medical Oncology, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
Katie O'Neill
Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin 8, Ireland
Nicola Keohane
Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
Maeve Aine Lowery
Department of Medical Oncology, Trinity St. James Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland