SETD2 deficiency in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) contributes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and disease acceleration by enhancing genetic instability and rewiring cellular metabolism and might be a novel biomarker of high risk disease since diagnosis
Abstract
Abstract There is an active quest for biomarkers of high-risk disease in CML. ASXL1 and other cancer gene mutations, some additional cytogenetic alterations and Philadelphia-associated rearrangements (collectively, additional genetic abnormalities or AGAs) appear to have a negative impact on response and survival outcomes, but they are likely to mirror a more genetically unstable disease. SETD2 is a histone methyltransferase responsible for the deposition of the trimethyl mark at histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36me3), a key epigenetic modification implicated in transcriptional elongation, chromatin architecture, DNA damage repair. SETD2 loss-of-function (LOF) due to inactivating mutations or, more frequently, accelerated proteasomal degradation, has recently been reported in patients (pts) with multi-TKI-resistant chronic phase (CP) or with blast phase (BP) CML, but it can be observed as early as at diagnosis, particularly in CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. In this study, we aimed to dissect the impact of SETD2 LOF in primary CD34+ progenitors and in CML cellular models where SETD2 was alternatively silenced or overexpressed, using an integrated approach combining liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-arrays) for discovery, and Western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence (IF), and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) for validation. In SETD2-deficient primary CD34+ progenitors from newly diagnosed CP CML pts, nucleofection of a SETD2-expressing construct reduced clonogenic potential of >50%, indicating that SETD2 LOF enhances leukemic cell propagation. Differential transcriptomic profiling in cell line models revealed SETD2-dependent transcriptional regulation of genes involved in DNA repair (MSH2, MSH6), cell cycle control (CDK1), and metabolic homeostasis (PFKP, LDHA, PDK1). Differential interactome profiling by LC-MS/MS identified SETD2 interactions with proteins critically involved in mismatch repair (MSH2, MSH6), cell division (α-/β-tubulin), and glycolysis (PFKP, PFKFB3, PD, LDHA). Notably, SETD2 was also found to interact with key kinases regulating proliferation and stress response, including ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. All MS-identified interactions were experimentally validated by IF and co-IP in nuclear, cytoplasmic, or cytoskeletal fractions. Furthermore, IF imaging demonstrated the nuclear colocalization of SETD2 with γ-H2AX foci upon hydrogen peroxide and UV-induced genotoxic stress and its recruitment to DNA damage sites, where it spatially overlapped with MSH2/MSH6 complexes. Integration of SNP-array analysis after chronic exposure to DNA damaging agents with ChIP-seq-based genomic mapping of H3K36me3 showed enrichment of breakpoints at SETD2 target sites (SETD2 knocked-down cell line: 29/45 vs 4/45 regions enriched in genomic breakpoints had loss vs gain of H3K36me3, respectively [p=0.0002]; SETD2-deficient cell line: 25/33 vs 1/33 regions enriched in genomic breakpoints had H3K36me3 loss vs gain, respectively [p=0.009]). Notably, we uncovered a novel role for SETD2 LOF in rewiring cellular metabolism, since SETD2 re-expression attenuated the glycolytic shift observed in SETD2-deficient cells, as evidenced by downregulation of glycolytic enzymes and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation complexes used by SETD2-deficient cells as compensation of TCA down-regulation. This was functionally validated in both total lysates and isolated mitochondrial fractions. In contrast, SETD2-deficient cells displayed hyperactivation of hypoxia-associated pathways, consistent with pseudohypoxic reprogramming. Finally, SETD2/H3K36me3 deficiency as assessed by a simple WB assay in total leukocytes could be detected in CP CML pts with AGAs at diagnosis, and, importantly, could discriminate non-optimal vs optimal responders to subsequent imatinib therapy (tx). Our findings point to SETD2 LOF as a key cooperating event in CML, that may act since diagnosis to set the stage for TKI resistance and disease acceleration by i) sustaining BCR::ABL1-independent genomic instability that fuels acquisition of AGAs before and despite TKI tx, and ii) inducing metabolic reprogramming towards glycolysis; ultimately enhancing leukemogenicity of CML progenitors. SETD2 LOF may serve as a biomarker of high-risk disease at diagnosis, and its impact on response to 2nd-gen TKIs or asciminib vs imatinib is worth to be explored further.
Article Details
Authors (22)
Manuela Mancini
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
Lucia Romagnoli
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
Sara De Santis
2University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Samantha Bruno
2Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, Bologna, Italy
Cristina Mosca
2University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Andrea Oldani
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
Alessandra Tagliavia
2University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Alessandra Merlotti
2Department of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA) Alma Mater Studiorum—Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Daniel Remondini
Erika Esposito
4Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Jessica Fiori
4Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Fausto Castagnetti
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Miriam Iezza
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli”, Bologna, Italy
Roberta Restuccia
2University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Vanessa Bagnis
2University of Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
Alessandra Iurlo
1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Daniele Cattaneo
1Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Marco Cerrano
7S.C. Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza-Presidio Molinette, Turin, Italy
Valentina Giai
Centre for Inflammation Research
Sara Galimberti
14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Pier Luigi Zinzani
12IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia “Seràgnoli,” Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Simona Soverini
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy