Serial proteomic characterization of plasma extracellular vesicles (EV) to identify changes that predict outcomes in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving <sup>177</sup> Lu-PSMA-617.

A Ali Arafa (University of Minnesota Department of Pharmacology, Minneapolis, MN) L Lauren Yu (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) D David Moline (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) E Ella Boytim (Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota) M Megan Ludwig (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) T Tianzhong Yang S Stuart H. Bloom (University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN) I Ian J. Okazaki (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) N Nicholas Zorko Y Yingchun Zhao (School of Mathematical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University 1 , Hohhot 010022,) Z Zuzan Cayci (Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) P Peter Villalta (University of Minnesota, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Minneapolis, MN) S Scott M. Dehm (Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota) J Justin M. Drake (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) J Justin Hwang (Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota) E Emmanuel S. Antonarakis (Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota)

Abstract

258 Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma offer a minimally invasive window into tumor biology. We hypothesized that deep proteomic profiling of plasma EVs can characterize dynamic molecular changes and predict outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: Of 100 prospectively enrolled patients receiving 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (Arafa, et al. ASCO 2025), 58 men had serial (baseline and on-treatment) plasma samples. EVs were isolated using differential ultracentrifugation and analyzed by shotgun mass spectrometry. Protein expression patterns (e.g. PSMA, B7-H3) were categorized as undetected at both baseline and follow-up (U-&gt;U) or detectable at both timepoints (D-&gt;D). Relative protein expression changes were dichotomized as increasing (&gt;10% increase) versus no change/decreasing (not a &gt;10% increase). Surface protein changes were quantified and associations with overall survival (OS) were sought using log-rank tests. Pathway-level analysis was conducted using pre-ranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to identify pathways associated with outcomes. Results: A total of 6,306 proteins were identified, with about 20% mapping to key cell-surface markers including PSMA, B7-H3, Trop-2, and STEAP1. When patients were stratified by the detection of the key 4 surface proteins (0–1, 2, or 3–4); increasing numbers of detected proteins were associated with progressively shorter OS using both baseline and follow-up samples (p&lt;0.0001 for both). Outcomes based on serial protein detection (D-&gt;D) or non-detection (U-&gt;U) patterns are shown in the Table. Increases in EV-derived PSMA (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3–5.9, p=0.002), Trop-2 (HR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5–15.7, p&lt;0.0001), and STEAP1 (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.6–20.2, p&lt;0.0001) were associated with worse OS, with a similar trend for increasing B7-H3 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 0.8–3.4, p=0.16). In GSEA analysis, fatty acid metabolism (NES=1.8, q=0.004), Hedgehog signaling (NES=1.7, q=0.02), bile acid metabolism (NES=1.6, q=0.03), and MYC targets (NES=1.5, q=0.04) were enriched in on-treatment samples from progressors, while angiogenesis (NES=1.6, q=0.02) was enriched in on-treatment samples from responders. Conclusions: On-treatment persistent detection or upregulation of EV-derived surface proteins (PSMA, B7-H3, Trop-2, and STEAP1) was associated with inferior overall survival in mCRPC patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617. These findings highlight the potential clinical utility of dynamic plasma EV proteomics for prognostic stratification and clinical trial selection. U-&gt;U (days) D-&gt;D (days) OS HR (difference) P PSMA 297 141 4.52 0.002 B7-H3 NR 175 7.3 p&lt;0.0001 Trop-2 247 79 5.27 p&lt;0.0001 STEAP1 268 79 10.76 p&lt;0.0001

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 258-258
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

A

Ali Arafa

University of Minnesota Department of Pharmacology, Minneapolis, MN

L

Lauren Yu

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

D

David Moline

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

E

Ella Boytim

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota

M

Megan Ludwig

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

T

Tianzhong Yang

S

Stuart H. Bloom

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN

I

Ian J. Okazaki

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

N

Nicholas Zorko

Y

Yingchun Zhao

School of Mathematical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University 1 , Hohhot 010022,

Z

Zuzan Cayci

Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

P

Peter Villalta

University of Minnesota, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Minneapolis, MN

S

Scott M. Dehm

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

J

Justin M. Drake

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

J

Justin Hwang

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

E

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota