Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA as a marker of response to immune checkpoint blockade in MSI-H gastrointestinal tumors.

V Victoria Higbie (Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Michael Brian LaPelusa (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) P Preksha Shah (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Merrida Childress (Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA) A Amaya Gasco (Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA) A Amy An (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Alisha Heather Bent (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) B Bryan K. Kee (Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) S Scott Kopetz (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) P Phat Le (Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) V Van K. Morris (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) S Shubham Pant (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) C Christine Parseghian (Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J John Paul Y.C. Shen (Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Robert A. Wolff (Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Michael J. Overman

Abstract

273 Background: Microsatellite instability- high (MSI-H) tumors have high rates of response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with prolonged durability of response. However, predicting who will have a response is difficult and there are limitations to radiographic evaluation of response. As circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a noninvasive approach to monitoring response and therapeutic efficacy, we sought to correlate ctDNA change with response to ICB in MSI-H gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of MSI-H GI patients receiving ICB who underwent serial ctDNA sequencing. Tissue-informed ctDNA monitoring utilized comprehensive genomic profiling results of pre-treatment tumor tissue from a clinical trial assay based on FoundationOne CDx, a variant selection algorithm to exclude non-tumor variants, and multiplex PCR of up to 16 patient-specific variants to detect and quantify ctDNA. ctDNA changes were correlated with radiographic response. Results: A total of 20 patients with MSI-H tumors were evaluated including 17 colon, 2 small bowel, and 1 pancreatic. For 12 patients, it was the first exposure to ICB whereas 8 had previously progressed and were being rechallenged with ICB. Response was seen in 9 patients with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) in 4 and partial response (PR) in 5 while 5 showed stable disease (SD) and progression (PD) in 6. All patients had baseline ctDNA samples and at least 1 serial ctDNA after ICB initiation (median number of samples was 3). The mean time from baseline to first on-treatment sample was 30 days (range 13-64 days). 4 patients had undetectable ctDNA levels at baseline and remained undetectable on treatment. Of the 16 that had detectable ctDNA at baseline, 11 had a decrease in ctDNA levels at 1st on-treatment sample and 5 had an increase. The mean percent change of ctDNA at 1st on-treatment for those who had a response (CR + PR) was a 76% decrease while the mean percent change for those with SD was a 7% increase and for those with PD a 72% increase (p=0.05). Of the 6 patients with BOR of PD, 5 had an increase in ctDNA and 1 had undetectable levels at baseline. Of the 5 patients with BOR of SD, 2 had a decrease, 1 had an increase, and 2 were undetectable at baseline. Duration of SD did not correlate with initial ctDNA response. Conclusions: Early ctDNA change correlated with response in MSI-H GI tumors suggesting that serial ctDNA monitoring may provide early indication of response even prior to radiographic evaluation.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 273-273
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

V

Victoria Higbie

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Michael Brian LaPelusa

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

P

Preksha Shah

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Merrida Childress

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA

A

Amaya Gasco

Foundation Medicine, Boston, MA

A

Amy An

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Alisha Heather Bent

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

B

Bryan K. Kee

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

S

Scott Kopetz

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

P

Phat Le

Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

V

Van K. Morris

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

S

Shubham Pant

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

C

Christine Parseghian

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

John Paul Y.C. Shen

Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Robert A. Wolff

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Michael J. Overman