Secondary graft failure after PT-cy: Modeling a candidate risk assignment biomarker based on lymphocyte reconstitution.  Results from the BMT CTN 1801 study.

K Kayleigh Ingersoll Omdahl (1Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States) S Steven Siegel (1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States) J Jiayi Dong S Susan DeWolf K Kyle Hebert D Donna Neuberg I Isabella Schichter (1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States) A Alexandre Albanese (1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States) P Paul Keskula (1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States) L Lorenzo Cagnin (1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States) K Kristy Applegate (4The Emmes Company, Rockland, United States) M Merav Bar S Saurabh Chhabra (6The Mayo Clinic Arizona, Pheonix, United States) S Sung Choi (7University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States) W William Clark S Suman Das (Department of Chemistry, GITAM University 1 , Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530045,) R Robert Jenq (1City of Hope, Hematology and HCT, Duarte, United States) R Richard Jones (1Johns Hopkins University, Oncology, Baltimore, United States) J John Levine (12Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States) B Brent Logan (2CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) M Michael Martens (13Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) H Hemant Murthy (2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States) A Armin Rashidi M Marcie Riches (Kura Oncology Inc., San Diego, California, United States) W Wael Saber (3CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) K Karamjeet Sandhu (11Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA) A Anthony Sung (16Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States) K Karilyn Larkin (17Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, United States) M Monzr M. Al Malki (1City of Hope, Duarte, United States) M Mahasweta Gooptu (1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States) H Hany Elmariah (Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States) A Amin Alousi (20MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) L Lyndsey Runaas (13Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) B Brian Shaffer (2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) A Andrew Rezvani (21Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States) N Najla El Jurdi (3CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) A Alison Loren (24University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States) M Mary Horowitz (2CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) J Javier Bolanos-Meade (1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Oncology, Baltimore, United States) S Shernan Holtan (1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States) A Ami Bhatt (21Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States) M Miguel-Angel Perales (1Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) L Leslie Kean (1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Graft Failure (GF) is a rare but devastating outcome of HCT. Primary GF (PGF), defined as a failure of neutrophil recovery by Day+28, is straightforward to diagnose. Diagnosing secondary GF (SGF) is more challenging, with its broad time-range, multiple confounding diagnoses, and lack of predictive biomarkers. In BMT CTN1703/1801, we analyzed patients receiving RIC HCT for heme malignancies with either Tac/MTX (n=159) or PT-Cy (n=165) GVHD prophylaxis. SGF was defined as donor chimerism <5% after initial donor engraftment. With Tac/MTX, there were 3 PGF and 1 SGF diagnoses. With PT-Cy, there were 4 PGF and 6 SGF. Median SGF diagnosis was Day +64 (range: Day+28-215). There were too few Tac/MTX patients to analyze SGF, but sufficient events with PT-Cy. To identify PT-Cy SGF predictors, we leveraged lymphocyte, T, B, and NK cell reconstitution analysis. In SGF we found an early, profound deficit in the reconstitution of all major lymphocyte populations, including total lymphocytes, T, B, and NK cells, as early as Day+28. This enabled the modeling of a SGF risk classifier based on the Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC). Methods: Clinical ALC measurements were performed on all SGF patients (n=6) and on non-GF controls with ALCs available (146 of 155 non-GF patients). Flow cytometry was performed on all PT-Cy SGF patients (n = 6) and from a subset of non-GF controls (n = 18: controls were chosen as patients without relapse or severe GVHD, to reduce confounders introduced by immunologic interventions, and for whom all samples, including from the graft infusion, were available). T, B, and NK counts, as well as T cell subsets, were compared (using Welch's T test) on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 63, 98, 180, 270, 365, 730, with SGF patients censored on the day of GF diagnosis. To interrogate the optimal ALC cutoff, the cumulative incidence of SGF was computed at Days +28 and +42, with death without GF as a competing risk. Results: We have previously demonstrated that, compared to Tac/MTX, PT-Cy patients exhibited an early decrease in reconstitution of all T cell populations (with normal NK and B cell reconstitution). Here we focused specifically on PT-Cy patients with or without SGF. Graft CD34 counts/kg were not different between SGF patients and non-GF patients (mean CD34/kg = 1.38 x10e6 (SGF) vs 0.67 x10e6 (non-GF, p = 0.61) However, even amidst the overarching early suppression in T cell reconstitution with PT-Cy, SGF patients could be easily distinguished from the larger PT-Cy cohort, based on more profound deficits in ALC, T, B and NK cells reconstitution, measured using 2 strategies: (1) SGF patients demonstrated significant early (Day +28) quantitative defects in the reconstitution of the ALC (mean +/- SEM 262+/-32 cells/µL (non-GF) vs 60 +/- 25 (SGF, p<0.0001), CD4 T cells (62 +/- 12 cells/µL vs 19+/-15, p=0.048), CD8 T cells (15 +/-3 cells/µL vs 3.5 +/-1 p=0.0009), all CD8 T cell subpopulations, as well as NK cells (116+/-31 cells/µL vs 2.9+/-1.4 cells/µL, p= 0.002) and B cells (3.5 +/-1.4 cells/µL vs 0.16+/-0.07 p =0.03). (2) In SGF, there was a significant deficit in the rate of rise of all major lymphocyte populations between Days 28-42-60 vs non-GF, including CD4 T cells (p<0.0001), CD8 T cells (p = 0.0002), B cells (p<0.0001), and NK cells (p =0.048). These discoveries suggested that a classifier could be identified to risk-stratify patients for SGF. We explored an ALC cutpoint, amenable to standard clinical lab analysis. A statistically significant threshold was identified at both Days+28 and +42, with Day+42 being most predictive: A threshold of 120 cells/µL was identified as optimal, with landmark analysis documenting a SGF rate of 34.7% below the cutpoint, and SGF of 1% above it (HR = 45.9, 95% CI 5.7 - 366). Conclusions: Despite the small number of events, PT-Cy patients with SGF demonstrated a distinctive reconstitution trajectory that encompassed an early, substantial, and sustained deficit in all lymphocyte counts, as well as a lack of their longitudinal expansion. This enabled the discovery of a candidate ALC biomarker cutpoint at Day+42 that could distinguish patients who were more likely to develop SGF. If confirmed, these data could generate a predictive biomarker for SGF, which would enable the design of trials evaluating early interventions (e.g. CD34+ boosts, DLI, modification of immunosuppression) to improve outcomes for these patients.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 4198-4198
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (43)

K

Kayleigh Ingersoll Omdahl

1Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States

S

Steven Siegel

1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States

J

Jiayi Dong

S

Susan DeWolf

K

Kyle Hebert

D

Donna Neuberg

I

Isabella Schichter

1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States

A

Alexandre Albanese

1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States

P

Paul Keskula

1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States

L

Lorenzo Cagnin

1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States

K

Kristy Applegate

4The Emmes Company, Rockland, United States

M

Merav Bar

S

Saurabh Chhabra

6The Mayo Clinic Arizona, Pheonix, United States

S

Sung Choi

7University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

W

William Clark

S

Suman Das

Department of Chemistry, GITAM University 1 , Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530045,

R

Robert Jenq

1City of Hope, Hematology and HCT, Duarte, United States

R

Richard Jones

1Johns Hopkins University, Oncology, Baltimore, United States

J

John Levine

12Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

B

Brent Logan

2CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

M

Michael Martens

13Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

H

Hemant Murthy

2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States

A

Armin Rashidi

M

Marcie Riches

Kura Oncology Inc., San Diego, California, United States

W

Wael Saber

3CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

K

Karamjeet Sandhu

11Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA

A

Anthony Sung

16Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

K

Karilyn Larkin

17Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, United States

M

Monzr M. Al Malki

1City of Hope, Duarte, United States

M

Mahasweta Gooptu

1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States

H

Hany Elmariah

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

A

Amin Alousi

20MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

L

Lyndsey Runaas

13Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

B

Brian Shaffer

2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

A

Andrew Rezvani

21Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States

N

Najla El Jurdi

3CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

A

Alison Loren

24University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States

M

Mary Horowitz

2CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

J

Javier Bolanos-Meade

1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Oncology, Baltimore, United States

S

Shernan Holtan

1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States

A

Ami Bhatt

21Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States

M

Miguel-Angel Perales

1Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

L

Leslie Kean

1Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical Schol, Boston, United States