Sarcopenia and body composition predict survival and reveal immunometabolic dysfunction via single-cell profiling in anti-BCMA CAR T-treated myeloma
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), achieving unprecedented responses even in heavily pretreated patients. However, outcomes remain highly variable, shaped by a multifactorial interplay of patient characteristics and disease biology. While these determinants are increasingly well-defined, the role of body composition - particularly adipose tissue and skeletal muscle distribution - has not been systematically evaluated in RRMM. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 108 RRMM patients treated with Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) between 2021 and 2025. BMI was calculated before CAR T-cell infusion and pre-treatment CT scans were used to quantify total (TAT), subcutaneous (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as well as skeletal muscle (SM) area. For survival analyses we used cohort-derived optimal cut-off values for adipose tissue (TAT: 227.24 cm², SAT: 118.85 cm², VAT: 108.39 cm²) to stratify groups, while established cut-offs were used to define sarcopenia (SM <52.4 cm²/m² for men and <38.5 cm²/m² for women). Immune profiling of peripheral blood was performed at leukapheresis (LP) and on days 0, 7, 14, 30, and 100 after CAR T-cell infusion, including assessments of CAR T-cell expansion. Single-cell RNA and T-cell receptor sequencing (scRNA/TCR-seq) was conducted on 178 longitudinal samples obtained at LP, as well as on days 30 and 100 post-infusion from 75 patients with available CT data, to further explore immunological effects of body composition. Results: The median age was 64.3 years, with 67% receiving cilta-cel and 33% ide-cel. Median PFS was 20.6 months, while median OS was not reached (12-month PFS and OS: 70.1% and 81.7%, respectively). Sarcopenia was present in 30% of patients, while low TAT, SAT, and VAT was observed in 25%, 28%, and 33%, respectively. Body composition parameters were independent of R-ISS, Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX), CAR T-cell product, number of prior therapy lines and CRS or ICANS. However, low SAT was linked to elevated levels of soluble BCMA (sBCMA) before infusion (161 vs 59.7ng/mL, p = 0.03). Normal (n=47) or low (n=3) BMI was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) compared to overweight (n=44) or obese (n=14) patients (HR=3.38, 95% CI: 1.05–11.01, p=0.03). Similarly, low TAT predicted inferior OS (HR=4.02, 95% CI:1.35–11.98, p=0.007), primarily driven by low SAT (HR=4.45, 95% CI: 1.45–13.63, p=0.004), while VAT had less impact on OS (HR=2.54, 95% CI:0.85-7.59, p=0.08). Sarcopenia predicted adverse OS (HR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.13–10.0, p=0.02), whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was not affected by adipose tissue parameters or sarcopenia. In a univariate cox regression analysis, low SAT as well as sarcopenia were significantly associated with reduced OS (p<0.05 respectively) and multivariate models identified low SAT as strongest independent predictor on OS (p=0.02) with no effects on PFS. At LP, both low SAT (CD3+: 174 vs 478*106/L, p=0.005; CD8+: 84 vs 275*106/L, p=0.002 and CD8+ Effector memory (CD8+EM): 38.6 vs 102*106/L, p=0.01) and sarcopenia (CD3+: 37 vs 96.3*106/L, p=0.03) correlated with reduced bystander T-cell counts, which was confirmed at single-cell resolution revealing diminished CD4+ granulysin-expressing cytotoxic (CD4+CTL_GNLY), CD8+EM, CD8+EM re-expressing CD45RA 1 (EMRA.1) and CD8+EMRA.2 T-cell populations, alongside reduced T-cell clonality (p < 0.05 respectively). Post infusion, T cells from low SAT and sarcopenic patients similarly exhibited impaired cytotoxic and interferon signaling, together with NF-κB activation and elevated mitochondrial OXPHOS pathway, rendering exhaustion and functional immunological impairment in CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets. Analysis of the effector (CAR T-cell counts) to target (sBCMA) ratio revealed a significantly decreased ratio in low SAT patients at day 30 after infusion (1.0 vs 7.8, p=0.04). Conclusion: Low SAT and sarcopenia emerge as prognostic factors in RRMM CAR T-cell therapy affecting survival, response and immunometabolic profiles. Their quantification through routine imaging enables cost-effective integration into clinical workflows providing an opportunity for early risk stratification. Targeted interventions such as exercise, nutritional support and metabolic optimization may enhance immune fitness and therapeutic outcomes.
Article Details
Authors (26)
Thomas Wiemers
Michael Rade
2Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Nora Grieb
3University Hospital of Leipzig, Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig, Germany
Maximilian Ferle
3University Hospital of Leipzig, Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Leipzig, Germany
Tihomir Dermendzhiev
4University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig, Germany
David Fandrei
2Institut Gustave Roussy, Computational Clinical Oncology Lab, UMR 981, Villejuif, France
Patrick Born
1University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Sabine Seiffert
5University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Anja Grahnert
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Maik Friedrich
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Ronny Baber
Markus Kreuz
Klaus Metzeler
4Department of Hematology, Cell Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Marco Herling
Carmen Herling
1University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Madlen Jentzsch
19Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Disease, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
Georg-Nikolaus Franke
4Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Andreas Boldt
5University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Clinical Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Ulrike Koehl
1Department of Cell and Gene Therapy Development, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
Kristin Reiche
Timm Denecke
Urvi Shah
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Myeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine, New York, United States
Uwe Platzbecker
Vladan Vucinic
15University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology, Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology and Infectious Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
Hans-Jonas Meyer
Maximilian Merz
11Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY