Salvage whole brain radiotherapy after methotrexate failure in primary cns lymphoma

S Shayla Murray (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States) G Gustav Cederquist (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States) K Kathryn Tringale (2UC San Diego, La Jolla, United States) Z Zachary Moore (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States) A Alexandra Dreyfuss (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States) B Beatrice Fregonese (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States) L Lauren Schaff (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Neurology, New York, United States) L Lorenzo Falchi (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) M Michael Scordo (Cellular Therapy Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) C Christian Grommes (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Neurology, New York, United States) J Joachim Yahalom (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) B Brandon Imber (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of mostly B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. While high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based regimens have significantly improved first-line outcomes, no consensus salvage strategy exists for relapsed or refractory disease. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is guideline-supported for consolidation, but its role after MTX failure remains poorly defined. Given the known radiosensitivity of PCNSL, we hypothesized that WBRT could provide meaningful survival benefit independent of MTX response. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with PCNSL treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with WBRT following failure of an HD-MTX containing regimen. Patients were included if they received WBRT for radiographically persistent or progressive disease at any time following an HD-MTX–containing regimen. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from WBRT start using Kaplan-Meier estimates and reported with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the impact of age ≤50 vs. >50 years) and normalized WBRT dose (<40 Gy BED10 vs. ≥40 Gy BED10). Results 52 patients treated between 2007-2024 met inclusion criteria. Median age at WBRT start was 59 years (range: 23–76) and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at diagnosis was 80 (range: 40–100). Patients received WBRT at a median of 8.7 months (range: 1.2–57.7 months) after initial diagnosis. Common WBRT doses included 45 Gy in 25 fractions (19%), 36 Gy in 20 fractions (17%), and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (10%). 27% received low dose WBRT (<40 Gy BED10). Median follow-up was 42.8 months among survivors and was 12.2 months among all patients. Median OS was 17.5 months (95% CI: 9–51 months). Patients aged ≤50 had significantly improved OS compared to patients >50 years (2-year OS 70% vs. 37%, p = 0.006). There was no significant OS difference when comparing patients who received <40 Gy BED10 vs. ≥40 Gy BED10 (p = 0.9). Discussion Amid evolving systemic therapy options for relapsed PCNSL, including immunomodulators, BTK inhibitors, and novel immunotherapies, the role of radiotherapy is uncertain. Our series provides the largest contemporary benchmark for salvage WBRT in methotrexate-refractory patients. We observed survival outcomes that compare favorably with systemic strategies, particularly for younger patients. Radiation dose was not associated with OS suggesting that traditional, higher doses of WBRT may be unnecessary to achieve adequate and durable disease control. These data reaffirm WBRT as a practical, effective salvage option and highlight the need for prospective studies to refine dose–fractionation, explore synergy with modern systemic agents, and incorporate neuroprotective strategies.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3679-3679
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

S

Shayla Murray

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States

G

Gustav Cederquist

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States

K

Kathryn Tringale

2UC San Diego, La Jolla, United States

Z

Zachary Moore

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States

A

Alexandra Dreyfuss

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States

B

Beatrice Fregonese

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States

L

Lauren Schaff

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Neurology, New York, United States

L

Lorenzo Falchi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

M

Michael Scordo

Cellular Therapy Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

C

Christian Grommes

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Neurology, New York, United States

J

Joachim Yahalom

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

B

Brandon Imber

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, New York, United States