Safety, efficacy, and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes from a phase 1 study of RMC-6236, a RAS(ON) multi-selective, tri-complex inhibitor, in patients with RAS mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

I Ignacio Garrido-Laguna (Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City) B Brian M. Wolpin W Wungki Park N Nilofer Saba Azad (Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD) A Alexander I. Spira (Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax) A Alexander Starodub (Christ Hospital, Cincinnati) D David Sommerhalder (NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX) S Salman Rafi Punekar (NYU Langone Health, New York, NY) B Benjamin Herzberg (Columbia University, New York) M Minal A. Barve (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX) M Meredith Pelster (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville) J Jennifer Brooke Valerin (Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA) J Joel R Hecht (UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA) R Rashmi Vora (Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA) A Aparna Madhukeshwar Hegde (Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA) C Clay Gustafson (Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA) L Lin Tao (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Suzhou New District) S Sumit Kar (Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA) K Kevin K. Lin (Clovis Oncology.com, San Francisco, CA) D David S. Hong (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston)

Abstract

722 Background: PDAC is the third leading cause of cancer mortality, with limited treatment options. Even with multi-agent chemotherapy, patients with second-line (2L) PDAC have a median progression-free survival (PFS) of ≈2–3.5 months and median overall survival (OS) of ≈6–7 months. RAS mutations occur in >90% of patients with PDAC, mainly KRAS G12X (G12X = non-synonymous mutations in KRAS codon 12 [G12]). RMC-6236 is an oral, RAS(ON), multi-selective, tri-complex inhibitor of the active GTP-bound state of both mutant and wild-type RAS. In a Phase 1 study, RMC-6236 demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in patients with PDAC harboring KRAS G12X or other RAS mutations (NCT05379985). Data on ctDNA reduction with targeted therapy in PDAC are sparse. We report safety, updated efficacy, and exploratory analyses of early ctDNA reduction with clinically active doses of RMC-6236 in patients with RAS mutant PDAC. Methods: Escalating doses of RMC-6236 were administered orally to patients with previously treated RAS mutant PDAC. Additional patients were enrolled for dose optimization and expansion. Patients receiving clinically active doses (160–300 mg QD) of RMC-6236 ≥14 weeks before the July 23, 2024 data cutoff were included. Plasma samples were collected for ctDNA analysis of change in RAS mutant variant allele fraction at baseline (BL; cycle 1, day 1 [C1D1]), and on treatment (C2D1 or C3D1). Results: As of July 23, 2024, 127 patients with RAS mutant PDAC had received RMC-6236 160–300 mg QD. The most common (≥10% of patients) any-grade treatment-related adverse events were rash (91%), diarrhea (48%), nausea (43%), vomiting (31%), stomatitis (31%), fatigue (20%), paronychia (13%), mucosal inflammation (13%), decreased appetite (11%), and peripheral edema (10%). The Table shows objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS with 2L RMC-6236. Paired plasma samples were tested in 106/127 patients. Of these, 68 patients with RAS mutant allele ctDNA at BL were evaluable for ctDNA response (Table). Conclusions: RMC-6236 showed a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy in patients with previously treated RAS mutant PDAC, and early and deep reductions in RAS mutant ctDNA. RASolute 302, a global, randomized, Phase 3 trial evaluating RMC-6236 as 2L treatment vs chemotherapy in patients with metastatic PDAC, is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05379985 . KRAS G12X RAS mutant Efficacy with 2L RMC-6236 (n=42) (n=57) ORR, % (95% CI)[confirmed + pending confirmation] 29 (16–45) 25 (14–38) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 8.5 (5.3–11.7) 7.6 (5.9–11.1) Median OS, months (95% CI) 14.5 (8.8–not evaluable) 14.5 (8.8–not evaluable) ctDNA Response with 2L+ RMC-6236 (n=56) (n=68) >50% decrease from BL, n (%) 53 (95) 63 (93) 100% decrease from BL, n (%) 28 (50) 32 (47)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 722-722
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

I

Ignacio Garrido-Laguna

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City

B

Brian M. Wolpin

W

Wungki Park

N

Nilofer Saba Azad

Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

A

Alexander I. Spira

Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax

A

Alexander Starodub

Christ Hospital, Cincinnati

D

David Sommerhalder

NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX

S

Salman Rafi Punekar

NYU Langone Health, New York, NY

B

Benjamin Herzberg

Columbia University, New York

M

Minal A. Barve

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX

M

Meredith Pelster

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville

J

Jennifer Brooke Valerin

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA

J

Joel R Hecht

UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA

R

Rashmi Vora

Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA

A

Aparna Madhukeshwar Hegde

Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA

C

Clay Gustafson

Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA

L

Lin Tao

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Suzhou New District

S

Sumit Kar

Revolution Medicines, Redwood City, CA

K

Kevin K. Lin

Clovis Oncology.com, San Francisco, CA

D

David S. Hong

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston