Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Results from FOxTROT 1 and the FOxTROT 2 safety cohort population.
Abstract
3653 Background: The FOxTROT1 (FT1; NCT00647530) trial demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of six weeks of NAC for LACC compared with upfront surgery. The currently recruiting FOxTROT2 trial (ISRCTN83842641) is testing this approach in older or frail patients. Outcomes in older patients with LACC are inferior; therefore, new treatment strategies are required. Here in these trials we analyse the safety and efficacy of NAC in this group and report the DFS in the older subgroup of FT1 PMMR patients. Methods: Data from FT1 and the planned FT2 safety pilot (n=150) were combined and analysed by treatment arm and by age category (</> 70). Pre-specified endpoints included NAC delivery and perioperative complication rates for FT1 and FT2; DFS and pathological response are reported for FT1 patients by MMR status. We will update safety data for this presentation. Results: In FT1 292/1052 (27.8%) of patients were aged over 70; the median age of FT2 safety cohort was 76 (range 70-85). There were no significant differences by age in NAC delivery or in rates of peri-operative complications. For patients over 70, combining FT1&2 data, exploring those who received NAC, 88.5% completed the course as planned and 37.7% received an upfront or subsequent dose modification. Rates of peri-operative complications combining FT1&2 were similar between patients receiving NAC or upfront surgery: anastomotic leak (3.4% vs 3.3%), complication requiring hospital stay (FT1 9.3% vs 14.6%) or further surgery (2.6% vs 5.0%), and post-operative death (0.9 % vs 1.7%). For patients over 70 in FT1 16.4% were dMMR and 83.6% were pMMR. In pMMR patients overall NAC improved 3-year DFS (81.2% vs 75.4% without a DFS event; HR 0.70[0.52–0.94],p=0.02) compared with upfront surgery; results were consistent in older patients (81.2% vs 71.4%; HR 0.59[0.35-1.02],p=0.06). Conclusions: NAC is safe and well-tolerated in older adults, with no increase in perioperative morbidity and preserved treatment delivery compared to rates in younger patients and when compared with upfront surgery. Promising efficacy in terms of 3-year DFS and pathological response were observed in older patients with pMMR tumors, consistent to those seen in younger patients. These data support the use of NAC in older patients with LACC and continued recruitment to FT2 to evaluate the long term impact. Clinical trial information: NCT00647530 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Janet Shirley Graham
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Laura Magill
Kelly Handley
Anna Perry
Emily Connell
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Faye Elliott
Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Nicholas West
Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
James Robert Platt
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Christopher Williams
School of Chemistry, Cantock’s Close
Michael Braun
Andrew David Beggs
Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Nancy Fernandes da Silva
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Matthew Seymour
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Aaisha Ali
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Rhiannon Lambkin
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Claire Dimbleby
Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
David A. Cairns
3Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
Dion Morton
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Jenny Seligmann
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom