Safety and efficacy of eniluracil + capecitabine (6422 + Cap) in phase 1b trial.
Abstract
e15152 Background: In comparison to the prior studies with eniluracil (6422) and 5-FU, 6422 + Cap uses a novel schedule of a single dose of 6422 followed the next 7 days with capecitabine (Cap) at a dose approximately one-tenth that of present monotherapy Cap (Mono-Cap). 6422 irreversibly inhibits dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the enzyme that metabolizes 5-FU to catabolites which cause side effects while providing no therapeutic benefit. Inhibition of DPD not only eliminates these catabolites but also exposes cancer cells to more 5-FU and more cancer killing 5-FU anabolites. The objectives of this Phase 1B study in gastrointestinal cancer patients were to: evaluate the safety and efficacy, evaluate exposure to Cap, 5-FU, and FBAL (major catabolite of 5-FU), determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), and determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose Range (RP2DR) for the optimal dosage regimen studies. Methods: The 3+3 design trial included patient cohorts who received ascending Cap doses given 7 days on/7 days off preceded 16-24 hours by a single dose of 6422 before the start of every Cap cycle. 5-FU and FBAL exposure (AUC) were calculated. All patients were refractory or intolerant to available cancer therapies. Radiological tumor response evaluation (RECIST 1.1) was performed every 8 weeks. Results: PK Results: 18 patients were enrolled in 4 dose levels from 75 mg qd to 225 mg BID of Cap. All 6422 + Cap BID dosing had 5-FU AUC exposure greater than reported for Mono-Cap. The AUC for the 150 mg BID and 225 mg BID cohorts were approximately 5-10 times the previously reported AUC for the typical 2,250 mg BID Mono-Cap treatment. The 5-FU T1/2 of approximately 3 hrs for these two cohorts was also much longer than 0.84 hrs reported for Mono-Cap. Efficacy-Safety Results: 36.4% (4/11) of the patients in the 150 mg BID and 225 mg BID cohorts had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) (eg, neutropenia) associated with anabolites, similar to the incidence reported for Mono-Cap. The extremely low FBAL catabolite formation/exposure across all 6422 + cap doses resulted in only 1 out of 18 patients (5.6%) having mild Grade 1 HFS, a much lower incidence and severity than Mono-Cap. For the 13 RECIST evaluable patients, partial response (PR) was 15.4% (2/13) and stable disease (SD) was 46.2% (6/13). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for the evaluable patients was 93 days (ranging from 53 to 332 days). For all 18 patients, PR was 11.1% (2/18 – the 2 PR patients in the highest Cap dose) and SD was 33.3% (6/18). Conclusions: Although 5-FU exposure was up to 5-10x greater than for Mono-Cap, AEs from 5-FU catabolites were minimal while anabolite associated AEs for the highest dose cohorts were similar to those reported for Mono-Cap. In these evaluable refractory or intolerant cancer patients, 6422 + Cap efficacy occurred with a PR of 15.4%, SD of 46.2%, and median PFS of 93 days. The MTD was 225 mg BID and RP2DR was 75 mg BID to 225 mg BID. Clinical trial information: NCT04861987 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
David Young
Biotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim
Sian Elizabeth Bigora
Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hanover, MD
Mary Nyberg
Processa Pharmaceuticals.com, Hanover, MD
Maya Das
Heliconia, West LLC, Santa Monica, CA
Amit Mahipal
Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Patrick M. Boland
Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
Eric Jay Feldman
Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
Howard S. Hochster
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ