Safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment with mucosal resection, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy in the curative treatment of early esophageal squamous cell cancer and dysplasia.
Abstract
4055 Background: Endoscopic esophageal treatment (EET), by radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (Cryo), and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has not been extensively studied in early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Aim: To assess the safety and success of EET in curative treatment of early esophageal SCC: (T1a, T1b, T2) and squamous cell dysplasia (SCD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with SCC (T1a, T1b, T2) and SCD treated with EET from January 2010 to August 2024. All patients had at least one follow-up endoscopic biopsy after treatment. Results: 62 patients met the eligibility criteria. Table. 46 patients (74%) had T1a (n=36.5%) or T1b (n=10.1%) SCC. T2 patients (21%) received ETT for local recurrence after chemoradiation. The most frequent ETT was EMR + RFA, n= 26 (41.9%) and RFA, n=20 (32%). In the first biopsy after treatment, 46 of the 62 patients (74.1%) had no residual cancer. This number increased after further ETT. 2 years after treatment only 4 patients had persistent cancer. BMI is significantly associated with survival status. No patient had disease progression that required surgery. Strictures formed in 15 patients (24%) post- ETT. Conclusions: ETT provides curative treatment of early SSC in up to 94% of patients. Association between cancer persistence at first post-biopsy with various demographic and clinical variables. Patient Characteristics Total N=62 P-value Sex (%) Male 28 (45.16%) 0.49 Female 34 (54.84%) Race (%) White / Caucasian 52 (83.87%) 0.716 Hispanic 2 (3.23%) Black 2 (3.23%) Asian 4 (6.45%) BMI, median (range) N = 62 24.02 (15, 44.5) 0.045 Smoking Status (%) No 25 (40.32%) 0.182 Yes 37 (59.68%) Alcohol Drinking (%) No 22 (35.48%) >0.99 Yes 40 (64.52%) Squamous Dysplasia (%) none 59 (95.16%) >0.99 Low 1 (1.61%) High 2 (3.23%) Squamous tumor staging (%) none 3 (4.84%) 0.174 T1a 36 (58.06%) T1b 10 (16.13%) ≥T2 13 (20.97%) Squamous Tumor Differentiation (%) Well 5 (8.2%) 0.707 Moderate 47 (77.05%) Poor 9 (14.75%) Lymphovascular Invasion (%) No 57 (91.94%) >0.99 Yes 5 (8.06%) 1b) Patient survival status - Immediate Post-Treatment Pathology Finding Patient Characteristics Total N=62 First biopsy post-treatment finding (%) No dysplasia or cancer 37 (59.68%) Persistent cancer (Failure of t/t) 16 (25.81%) Persistent Dysplasia 9 (14.52%) 1c) Patient survival status ≥2 years post-treatment, excluding patients with no data or recurrent cancer/dysplasia Patient Characteristics Total N=21 Biopsy finding (%) No dysplasia or cancer 15 (71.43%) Persistent cancer (Failure of t/t) 4 (19.05%) Persistent Dysplasia 2 (9.52%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Sidra Naz
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Internal Medicine, Houston, United States
Ahmed Elhariri
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Wei Qiao
Applied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry
Christopher Matthew Manuel
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Marta Davila
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mehnaz Azra Shafi
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX