Safety and efficacy of consolidation-Phase blinatumomab in newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia : A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Abstract Background: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) accounts for 0.3% of all new cancer cases and 0.2% of cancer-related deaths in the United States. While survival outcomes have improved over the years, further intensifying chemotherapy has offered diminishing returns. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting CD3 and CD19, has shown clinical benefit in minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive and relapsed/refractory settings. Its recent FDA approval for use in the consolidation phase of newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–negative, CD19-positive B-ALL followed the landmark E1910 trial, which demonstrated a survival advantage when added to standard chemotherapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in the consolidation phase across clinical trials and real-world studies. Methods: A comprehensive review was carried out on PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane library from inception up to July 2025 using the terms “Blinatumomab” and “ALL”. Studies that evaluated response: overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) and adverse events between Blinatumomab and control groups were included. Out of the 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 12 were clinical trials and 7 were observational studies. Open meta-analyst software was used to analyze the data. For single arm study, PLO (logit-transformed proportion) was used as a metric. Der Simonian-Laird random effects model was used to generate forest plots of pooled response rate estimates and 95% CI along with p-values and I2 statistics for heterogeneity. Results: A total of 824 patients were included (54.4% male, 45.6% female), with a median age of 48 years. The median follow-up across studies was 18.2 months (range, 3.4 to 92.8 months). Pooled ORR was 96.4% (95% CI, 93–98; p=0.955), and pooled CR was 92.7% (95% CI, 87–95; p<0.001). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 6.8% (95% CI, 2.5–11.2; p=0.004), dose reductions in 2.9% (95% CI, 0.2–5.6; p=0.069), and treatment-related mortality in 1.4% (95% CI, 0.4–2.3; p=0.256). There was moderate heterogeneity across studies for toxicity outcomes. Conclusion: Consolidation-phase blinatumomab is associated with high response rates and a favorable safety profile, reinforcing the survival gains observed in E1910 (3-year OS: 83% vs 65%). With low rates of treatment-limiting toxicity and mortality, our findings support the incorporation of blinatumomab into standard adult B-ALL consolidation regimens. These data suggest that this immunotherapeutic approach may help narrow the outcome gap between adult and pediatric ALL.
Article Details
Authors (13)
Yagnapriya Ammakola
2Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, United States
Chandra Kakarala
1University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States
Mahnoor Sukaina
4Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
Kumar Madhan
4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
Sameer Deshmukh
5Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama, United States
Haritha Gandicheruvu
3Sinai Hospital/George Washington University, Baltimore, United States
Zeeshan Javed
Saman Amjad
1Corewell Health East, Michigan, United States
Nitya Batra
1Mayo Clinic, Hematology & Oncology, Jacksonville, United States
Atulya Khosla
7Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital., MI, United States
Mohammad Ganiyani
8Baptist Health, Miami, United States
Manas Pustake
2Texas Tech University El Paso, El Paso, United States
Karan Jatwani
7George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States