S1900E: A phase II study examining impact of co-mutations on sotorasib for previously treated stage IV/recurrent <i>KRAS</i> G12C mutated (MUT) non-squamous (Non-sq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (ECOG-ACRIN led Lung-MAP Sub-study).

S Sukhmani Kaur Padda (Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA) M Mary Weber Redman (SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) D David E. Gerber K Katherine Minichiello (SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) D Dhaval R. Mehta (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Monroeville, PA) S Sandeep H. Mashru (Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR) H Hosam Hakim (Van Elslander Cancer Center, Grosse Pointe, MI) J Julie R. Brahmer J Jeffrey D. Bradley (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA) T Tom Stinchcombe (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC) J Jhanelle E. Gray (Department of Thoracic Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa Florida USA) K Karen Kelly (International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, CO) D David E. Kozono K Karen L. Reckamp M Martin Joseph Edelman (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) H Hossein Borghaei J Jyoti D. Patel (Tempus AI, Chicago, IL) R Roy S. Herbst S Suresh S. Ramalingam J Joel W. Neal

Abstract

8518 Background: In previously treated KRAS G12C MUT NSCLC, the allosteric KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib had superior outcomes compared to docetaxel (ORR 28% vs 13%). S1900E was the first to prospectively test sotorasib in KRAS G12C MUT NSCLC according to co-mutations (CO-MUT) in tumor suppressor genes such as TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 . We report on the results of TP53 and STK11 CO-MUT cohorts of S1900E and hypothesized that CO-MUT would not impact the efficacy of sotorasib. Methods: Pts with KRAS G12C MUT identified by FoundationOne CDx tissue assay in the LUNGMAP screening master protocol were assigned to S1900E. Pts with stage IV/recurrent non-sq NSCLC who had progressed after ≥1 line of systemic therapy, and were ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. There were 3 biomarker cohorts: 1 ( TP53 CO-MUT &amp; wild type [WT] STK11 , KEAP1 / NFE2L2 / CUL3) ; 2 ( STK11 CO-MUT &amp; WT TP53 , KEAP1/NFE2L2 / CUL3) ; 3 (all others). The primary objective was to evaluate the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 in each cohort. Accrual goals for Cohorts 1 and 2 were 40 and 25 evaluable pts, respectively, based on a 1-stage binomial design with 90% power to rule out a 14% ORR (historical second-line docetaxel ORR) at the 1-sided 5% level. Results: S1900E completed accrual with 118 total pts and 103 evaluable from Apr 2021-Dec 2024; 59 (57%) were female and 86 (84%) were non-Hispanic white. In the TP53 CO-MUT (N=48; 40 evaluable) and STK11 CO-MUT (N=28; 25 evaluable) cohorts, respectively, 48% and 68% received only one prior line of therapy, 70% and 76% received both platinum chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, 68% and 24% were female, known PD-L1 expression (≥1% / ≥50%) was 95%/45% and 43%/0%, and almost all had smoked. In the TP53 CO-MUT cohort, confirmed ORR was 35% (CI 23-47). In the STK11 CO-MUT cohort, confirmed ORR was 16% (CI 4-28). Disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), investigator progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) (Table 1) had numerically higher values in the TP53 CO-MUT cohort. Adverse event rates ≥ Grade 3 were similar to prior reports of single agent sotorasib. Conclusions: TP53 CO-MUT cohort met its primary endpoint, while the STK11 CO-MUT cohort did not, suggesting that STK11 CO-MUT have detrimental effect on sotorasib in KRAS G12C NSCLC. S1900E Cohort 3, which may include KEAP1/NFE2L2 and other CO-MUT, will be reported later, as will resistance patterns identified through ctDNA analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT04625647 . TP53 CO-MUT (N=40) STK11 CO-MUT (N=25) ORR (90% CI) 35% (23-47) 16% (4-28) DCR (90% CI) 78% (67-88) 60% (44-76) Follow-Up Median mo 19.5 16.8 DOR [Median mo (95% CI)] 7.1 (2.7-11.5) 6.2 (1.6-NA) PFS [Median mo (95% CI)] 5.7 (3.0-8.4) 4.1 (2.6-7.1) OS [Median mo (95% CI)] 18.2 (12.2-33.7) 8.0 (5.1-14.2)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 8518-8518
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Sukhmani Kaur Padda

Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA

M

Mary Weber Redman

SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

D

David E. Gerber

K

Katherine Minichiello

SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

D

Dhaval R. Mehta

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Monroeville, PA

S

Sandeep H. Mashru

Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR

H

Hosam Hakim

Van Elslander Cancer Center, Grosse Pointe, MI

J

Julie R. Brahmer

J

Jeffrey D. Bradley

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA

T

Tom Stinchcombe

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

J

Jhanelle E. Gray

Department of Thoracic Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa Florida USA

K

Karen Kelly

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, CO

D

David E. Kozono

K

Karen L. Reckamp

M

Martin Joseph Edelman

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

H

Hossein Borghaei

J

Jyoti D. Patel

Tempus AI, Chicago, IL

R

Roy S. Herbst

S

Suresh S. Ramalingam

J

Joel W. Neal