Revisiting Coulombic Efficiency Paradigm: Electrolyte Additive Design for Lithium Metal Batteries

Q Qixin Wang J Jiaxun Yang (Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China) P Pu Li K Kun Zhao X Xinxin Zhang (Center for Ultrafast Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Synergistic Chem-Bio Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhang Jiang Institute for Advanced Study) B Bowen Zheng (School of Materials Science and Engineering and Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials) Q Qiangfu Sun (Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China) Z Zhongyang Zhang W Wenfang Feng (Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China) J Javier Carrasco (Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE) Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Vitoria‐Gasteiz Spain) H Hailong Yu G Gebrekidan Gebresilassie Eshetu (Institute of Power Electronics and Electric Drives (ISEA), Center for Ageing Reliability and Lifetime Prediction of Electrochemical and Power Electronic Systems (CARL) RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany) E Egbert Figgemeier (Institute of Power Electronics and Electric Drives (ISEA), Center for Ageing Reliability and Lifetime Prediction of Electrochemical and Power Electronic Systems (CARL) RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany) M Michel Armand (Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE)) X Xuejie Huang (Beijing Frontier Research Center on Clean Energy) Z Zhibin Zhou H Heng Zhang

Abstract

ABSTRACT Small‐dose electrolyte additives are widely used to enhance battery performance, yet rational additive selection for the stabilization of lithium metal (Li°) electrodes remains challenging. Coulombic efficiency (CE) measurements in asymmetric Li°||Cu° cells serve as critical evaluative metrics, but the resulting CE values often deviate from expectations based on additive structure alone. Herein, we delve into the design of fluorinated electrolyte additives by combining statistical analysis of Li°||Cu° cycling data with compositional characterization as well as atomistic and chemical simulations. Our results demonstrate that nonafluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride, as an electrolyte additive, induces only a marginal effect on the Aurbach CE values during short‐term cycling tests of Li°||Cu° cells. Intriguingly, during extended‐cycling, statistical analysis reveals that the same additive exhibits divergent effects in electrolyte families based on bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (TFSI − ) and bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (FSI − ) anions. These differences arise from the interplay between the film‐forming chemistry of the fluorinated additive and the active involvement of TFSI − and FSI − anions, which collectively modulate the chemical and electrochemical features of the resulting solid‐electrolyte interphases (SEI) on Li°. This work elucidates how additive functionality translates into interphase chemistry and provides a statistically robust framework for screening electrolyte additives for practical lithium metal batteries.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published July 31, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (17)

Q

Qixin Wang

J

Jiaxun Yang

Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

P

Pu Li

K

Kun Zhao

X

Xinxin Zhang

Center for Ultrafast Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Synergistic Chem-Bio Synthesis, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Zhang Jiang Institute for Advanced Study

B

Bowen Zheng

School of Materials Science and Engineering and Institute of Smart Biomedical Materials

Q

Qiangfu Sun

Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

Z

Zhongyang Zhang

W

Wenfang Feng

Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage (Ministry of Education), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

J

Javier Carrasco

Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE) Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Vitoria‐Gasteiz Spain

H

Hailong Yu

G

Gebrekidan Gebresilassie Eshetu

Institute of Power Electronics and Electric Drives (ISEA), Center for Ageing Reliability and Lifetime Prediction of Electrochemical and Power Electronic Systems (CARL) RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

E

Egbert Figgemeier

Institute of Power Electronics and Electric Drives (ISEA), Center for Ageing Reliability and Lifetime Prediction of Electrochemical and Power Electronic Systems (CARL) RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

M

Michel Armand

Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE)

X

Xuejie Huang

Beijing Frontier Research Center on Clean Energy

Z

Zhibin Zhou

H

Heng Zhang