Retrospective analysis of treatment responses to enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab (EVP) based on FGFR2/3 alterations in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC).

M Mamta Parikh (University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA) S Steven Neema Seyedin (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) M Mira Semaan (Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) A Amanda Macaraeg (University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA) A Ali Raad (Stern Center for Cancer Clinical Trials and Research, Chao Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA) K Kevin R. Reyes (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) S Suzanne Dufault (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) D Dimitrios Stefanoudakis (University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) A Alexandra Drakaki N Neda Hashemi-Sadraei (University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM) T Terence W. Friedlander N Nataliya Mar (University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA)

Abstract

688 Background: Reports vary as to the relationship between FGFR2/3 mutations (FGFR2/3m) and responses to EV in pts with aUC. As EVP has been rapidly adopted as first-line treatment based on results from the EV-302 trial, responses to treatment with EVP in patients with and without FGFR2/3m have not been well-described to date. We sought to examine a retrospective cohort of pts with aUC treated with EVP to determine whether there are differences in responses based on FGFR2/3m. Methods: Data from 5 academic institutions were collected from patients with aUC treated with first-line EVP from 8/13/2018 to 8/20/2025. Pts needed to have at least 1 whole body scan to assess for treatment response, which was interpreted using RECIST by the treating physician. Extracted data from the electronic health record (EHR) included demographic, clinical, and genomic variables. We also collected data on FGFR2/3m present, absent, or unknown. Those with unknown FGFR2/3 status were excluded from analysis. Primary endpoint was median PFS (mPFS), defined as time from EVP initiation to progressive disease by RECIST v1.1 criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Data were collected from 143 pts, with 122 pts having known FGFR2/3 status. Select clinical characteristics in the study population are outlined in Table 1. FGFR2/3m were noted in 34 pts, while 88 were wildtype (wt). Pts with FGFR2/3m experienced a shorter mPFS (5.2 months, 95% CI 4.0-24) than those with FGFR2/3 wt (16 months, 95% CI 9.2-35; p=0.029). Overall survival was not significantly different. Conclusions: While a limited retrospective dataset, shorter mPFS was observed in pts with FGFR2/3m aUC. This may inform future research development of first-line treatment of aUC in pts with FGFR2/3m. Clinical characteristics and efficacy. FGFR2/3m(n=34) FGFR2/3 wt(n=88) Age (median, range) 66 (37, 86) 73 (27, 95) Male (n,%) 24 (71%) 63 (72%) Upper Tract Primary (n,%) 11 (33%) 21 (24%) Lymph node only metastases (n,%) 24 (71%) 59 (67%) Median PFS (months, 95% CI) 5.2 (4.0, 24) 15 (9.2, 35) Median OS (months, 95% CI) 33 (24, --) 29 (20, --)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 688-688
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

M

Mamta Parikh

University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA

S

Steven Neema Seyedin

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

M

Mira Semaan

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

A

Amanda Macaraeg

University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA

A

Ali Raad

Stern Center for Cancer Clinical Trials and Research, Chao Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA

K

Kevin R. Reyes

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

S

Suzanne Dufault

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

D

Dimitrios Stefanoudakis

University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

A

Alexandra Drakaki

N

Neda Hashemi-Sadraei

University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM

T

Terence W. Friedlander

N

Nataliya Mar

University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA